STCU Negotiations 2010

News about Theme Parks and their parent companies.
glendalais
Seasoned Pro
Seasoned Pro
Posts: 824
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 5:26 pm
Location: Orlando, Fla.

STCU Negotiations 2010

Post by glendalais » Mon Oct 04, 2010 12:10 am

It's that time of the four-year cycle once again. Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. has offered what they are referring to as their "best" offer to the Service Trades Council Union, which represents Full Time and Casual Regular Walt Disney World Resort Cast Members in most Hourly Guest Service Roles.

Agreements have been reached between the Company and STCU on all Side Letter Agreements (effecting specific Lines of Business or Roles) and non-economic matters.

Cast Members can obtain information on their respective Side Letter by contacting their Member Union.

The following Non-Economic terms, among others, have been agreed to between the two parties:
  • Right to wear Union Pins on Company-issued costumes in Backstage Roles.
  • Protection of all Coordinator positions, and the current method of Coordinator selections.
  • Protection of current Transfer Language
Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. has proposed, among others, the following Economic terms:

42 Month Agreement (3 October 2010 - 29 March 2014)

Wages

For Cast Members hired before 12 December 1998
2010-10-02: $550 Bonus
2011-04-03: 2% Increase
2012-04-01: 2.25% Increase
2013-03-31: 2.5% Increase

For Cast Members hired after 12 December 1998
2010-10-02: $550 Bonus
2011-04-03: 2% Increase
2012-04-01: 2.25% Increase
2013-03-31: 2.5% Increase

Health Insurance
Negotiated Caps on HMO Costs. Average annual increases between $3 and $12 depending on coverage level and year of agreement.

Retirement
No Change

Holidays/Vacations
No Change

Random Alcohol/Drug Testing
Allowed, but only with prior Union approval.

The Company is offering Cast Members a $100 bonus if the Contract is ratified on the first vote.

The Service Trades Council Union will be organizing a vote in the coming weeks to put the proposed contract to their memberships. More information will be posted in the work areas.



GaTechGal
Seasoned Pro
Seasoned Pro
Posts: 835
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 8:06 pm

Re: STCU Negotiations 2010

Post by GaTechGal » Mon Oct 04, 2010 2:11 pm

That sounds pretty sweet. I haven't gotten an increase in my salary in 2 years and my health insurance went up 25% this year. And that $100 bonus would be an real incentive to vote yes the first time around.



darph nader
Permanent Fixture
Permanent Fixture
Posts: 4844
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 9:16 pm

Re: STCU Negotiations 2010

Post by darph nader » Mon Oct 04, 2010 4:29 pm

I don't get the drug test with prior approval. Doesn't that pretty much defeat the whole 'random' part? :confused: :dope:


Beer....The reason I get up every,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,afternoon.

Shorty82
Should be on Payroll
Should be on Payroll
Posts: 2531
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:53 pm
Location: The Twin Cities.

Re: STCU Negotiations 2010

Post by Shorty82 » Mon Oct 04, 2010 8:50 pm

According to the UNITE HERE! Local 362 blog the wages section is actually:
Wages
Workers hired before 12/12/1998 – “Topped-out”
10/2/2010 - $550 Bonus
4/3/2011 - 2% wage increase
4/1/2012 - 2.25% wage increase
3/31/2013 - 2.5% wage increase

Workers hired after 12/12/1998 – “In-range”
10/2/2010 - $550 Bonus
4/3/2011 - 3% wage increase
4/1/2012 - 3% wage increase
3/31/2013 - 3% wage increase

This makes more sense to me, I thought it was strange that both before and after 12/12/1998 were the same.
darph nader wrote:I don't get the drug test with prior approval. Doesn't that pretty much defeat the whole 'random' part? :confused: :dope:
According to the blog mentioned above the drug testing will apply to driving roles and only with agreement from the Union. I don't understand the union part for sure but I guess it means that if the company intends to start a round of drug testing the union has to agree to it.

UNITE HERE is recommending a "No" vote as the proposed wage increases get eaten up by the proposed increases in health insurance and will result in most CMs making less.


Around here, however, we don’t look backwards for very long.

We keep moving forward, opening up new doors and doing new things, because we're curious…
and curiosity keeps leading us down new paths.

-Walt Disney
:wwwd:
Keep moving forward

darph nader
Permanent Fixture
Permanent Fixture
Posts: 4844
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 9:16 pm

Re: STCU Negotiations 2010

Post by darph nader » Mon Oct 04, 2010 9:00 pm

So Shorty,what you're saying is,that the Union over rules the feds/state on drug tests for drivers. Humm? When I was a driver,when you got the notice in the mail,you dropped what you were doin and wrote your name in a jar. THAT day,no questions asked.


Beer....The reason I get up every,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,afternoon.

User avatar
Zazu
Permanent Fixture
Permanent Fixture
Posts: 4133
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 3:00 pm
Park: WDW
Position: retired
Location: 8 miles east of Spaceship Earth
Contact:

Re: STCU Negotiations 2010

Post by Zazu » Mon Oct 04, 2010 9:07 pm

I love it! Here I am a shop steward and I get news of this first from SGT.

Is this a great forum or what?!?



... yeah, don't answer that. I'm in TCU so I know that "what" is the answer.


Zazu

Shorty82
Should be on Payroll
Should be on Payroll
Posts: 2531
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:53 pm
Location: The Twin Cities.

Re: STCU Negotiations 2010

Post by Shorty82 » Mon Oct 04, 2010 9:30 pm

darph nader wrote:So Shorty,what you're saying is,that the Union over rules the feds/state on drug tests for drivers. Humm? When I was a driver,when you got the notice in the mail,you dropped what you were doin and wrote your name in a jar. THAT day,no questions asked.
I'm just guessing by what I read on the blog. I don't know the federal and state requirements on drug testing.


Around here, however, we don’t look backwards for very long.

We keep moving forward, opening up new doors and doing new things, because we're curious…
and curiosity keeps leading us down new paths.

-Walt Disney
:wwwd:
Keep moving forward

DisneyMom
Permanent Fixture
Permanent Fixture
Posts: 5002
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 7:14 pm
Park: DLR Guest
Department: Churro Inspection
Position: In Line for POTC

Re: STCU Negotiations 2010

Post by DisneyMom » Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:55 pm

darph nader wrote:I don't get the drug test with prior approval. Doesn't that pretty much defeat the whole 'random' part? :confused: :dope:
Hair follicle test? Think it tells all :cool:


:flybongo: NO BULL!!!!!:D:

glendalais
Seasoned Pro
Seasoned Pro
Posts: 824
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 5:26 pm
Location: Orlando, Fla.

Re: STCU Negotiations 2010

Post by glendalais » Tue Oct 05, 2010 6:37 am

darph nader wrote:So Shorty,what you're saying is,that the Union over rules the feds/state on drug tests for drivers. Humm? When I was a driver,when you got the notice in the mail,you dropped what you were doin and wrote your name in a jar. THAT day,no questions asked.
The largest thing most STCU Cast Members drive is a Van or Large Pickup Truck; and, with the exception of Transportation, WDW as an organization is generally not involved in the "aviation, trucking, railroads, mass transit, pipelines, and other transportation" industries as defined in the Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act of 1991.

Most Cast Members in Transportation are still subject to DoT regulations, but they have to inform the Union before they start demanding samples. It's still random - one day out of the blue the Union gets a call basically stating "We're taking samples. 'k, thanks, bye!".



Big Wallaby
Permanent Fixture
Permanent Fixture
Posts: 5734
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 7:19 pm
Location: Vancouver, Washington

Re: STCU Negotiations 2010

Post by Big Wallaby » Tue Oct 05, 2010 9:12 am

DisneyMom wrote:Hair follicle test? Think it tells all :cool:
Agreed! Since I found out about the follicle test, I decided that if I ever start a company, I would use that instead of the urine test, even if it's a lot more expensive.

I would rather they do drug tests than just dumb everything down (the way they have) so as to make Eisner right, that a trained monkey could do my job.


My opinions are mine and mine only. If my opinions are the opinion of others who happen to share whatever my crazy views may be, then fine, but it's not because I represent them in having my opinions. Got it?

Post Reply