now that is just toooooo spooky!!!CujoSR wrote:Look at 3.14 in the mirror.
hehehehhee
now that is just toooooo spooky!!!CujoSR wrote:Look at 3.14 in the mirror.
First, you can't do DL and DCA in one day and make it home for dinner, DCA, yes, but DL no. And DL and DCA, no way. Even with a wheelchair and/or GAC card, you won't make it through all of it and make it home in time for dinner.Honda Enoch wrote:Sure thing. I bet it's nice to be able to go to DL and DCA all in one day and still be able to make it home in time for dinner :)
Your right, DCA was an attempt to keep people on property, They saw that everyone was going to WDW for the fun stuff, so they slapped together a fair in the parking lot tossing in attractions that are popular at WDW.
Disneyguy85 wrote:I just have to say, I can only speak for myself, but I think that it has been established here that Walt Disney did NOT ever think that Disneyland itself was a mistake. (That is such a sick thing to say) This park was his baby!
So Disney decided to send attractions that were not popular over to DCA just for the fun of it???? Interesting.lady ulrike wrote:...I also would not classify It's Tough to be a Bug or Muppet Vision 3-D as attractions that are popular at WDW,
What they did was put in a couple of attractions that were cheap to duplicate. If they were looking to put in popular attractions from WDW, they had many others to choose from, but Paul Pressler was in charge when DCA was built and his attitude towards attractions had nothing to do with the quality or popularity of an attraction but simply how much it cost to build an attraction.Honda Enoch wrote: So Disney decided to send attractions that were not popular over to DCA just for the fun of it???? Interesting.
That makes perfect sense. Disney don't care about whats popular or not. They want to fill a brand new park (at the time) with as many cheap, low popularity attractions as they can so the park will be a success and that way they don't have to come back later and demolish a bunch of things and expand the park with new popular attractions.lady ulrike wrote:What they did was put in a couple of attractions that were cheap to duplicate. If they were looking to put in popular attractions from WDW, they had many others to choose from, but Paul Pressler was in charge when DCA was built and his attitude towards attractions had nothing to do with the quality or popularity of an attraction but simply how much it cost to build an attraction.
I'm guessing you know little or nothing about Paul Pressler. You see, he seemed to think that Guests came to Disney Parks for shopping, not to ride attractions, DCA was his baby. If you had ever been to the park, especially in it's early days, you'd see that there are just about as many stores are attractions. So, if you replace that at that time Pressler was in charge of what into that park, then yes, that's pretty much exactly the situation. He's also the one responsible for the failure of the Rocket Rods, cause he wouldn't let them spend the money that was necessary to build it correctly, so they had to take shortcuts and therefore it was an inferior attraction.Honda Enoch wrote:That makes perfect sense. Disney don't care about whats popular or not. They want to fill a brand new park (at the time) with as many cheap, low popularity attractions as they can so the park will be a success and that way they don't have to come back later and demolish a bunch of things and expand the park with new popular attractions.