Stupid Guest Tricks

Men with cloaks and swords. . .

*swoon*

February wrote:Men with cloaks and swords. . .

*swoon*

OR an old yellow raincoat and wooden spatula?

GRUMPY PIRATE wrote:OR an old yellow raincoat and wooden spatula?

Trying to tell us something, Pirate? :p:

DisneyMom wrote:Trying to tell us something, Pirate? :p:

No, just wondering what your "threshold" was!!!

GRUMPY PIRATE wrote:No, just wondering what your "threshold" was!!!

Well, if my hubby was outside cooking in the rain (Probably while we are somewhere camping) I would be quite turned on! :p:

DisneyMom wrote:Well, if my hubby was outside cooking in the rain (Probably while we are somewhere camping) I would be quite turned on! :p:

OKAY!! I was just thinking that since this IS the SGT, I should have replaced the yellow raincoat with a WDW rain Poncho!!!

GRUMPY PIRATE wrote:OKAY!! I was just thinking that since this IS the SGT, I should have replaced the yellow raincoat with a WDW rain Poncho!!!

Oooooooh, Sexy! Especially if camping at WDW! :D:

Randy B wrote:For all you Al-ites (Al-ions, Al-ees, Hmmmm there HAS to be something that sounds right)
Randy

Al-maniacs? Al-aholics?

Pirate and Disneymom, I'm crying I'm laughing so hard LOL

Ow Ow ow (i can still feel where the dentist got me with that needle yesterday! Repeatedly!)

ROFL Thanks I needed that LOL

hobie16 wrote:How many were keepers?

All of them. Most of them were pieces of huge panoramas. The largest panorama I shot included just over 100 individual shots. The smallest was just under 70. The results are spectacular. Concider this. Each pano is 30 to 80 megapixel and on most they give a full 360 deg view with the ability to zoom in enough to see fine details. One day I will find a web photo album site (free) where I can post these images full size. They REALLY lose impact badly when shrunk to fit the maximum size of most photo servers.

Actually I did have a couple of the panos that didn't turn out well as they were too big for my laptop to process in one chunk. And when I processed them in pieces, and then put the pieces together with a different program they came out less than impressive. But I just upgraded my laptop memory that should allow me to almost tripple the size of image I can process. So I may try to redo these massive images. But the old, smaller ones took about 2 hours to process (with a dual processor) so I will wait until I won't be wanting the computer for half a day or so.

Randy