Re: That's not how I would have choosen to wake up.
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 4:40 am
Cran, don't you mean "illiterate." :D:Cranbiz wrote:Sometimes you guys are too literal.
Just had to. ;) Just had to. ;)Stupid Guest Tricks
Stories about guest behavior in theme parks.
https://unclewalts.com/forum/
That's not how I would have choosen to wake up.
Page 2 of 2
Just had to. ;)Re: That's not how I would have choosen to wake up.
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 4:41 am
[quote="Main Streeter"]Cran, don't you mean "illiterate." :D: Just had to. ]
Yeah, that too! :D: ;)
Just had to. ]Yeah, that too!
:D: ;)Re: That's not how I would have choosen to wake up.
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 10:14 am
Only if they're downwind.Cranbiz wrote:If the shit plant burns in the middle of the night and nobody see's it, does anybody really care?
Re: That's not how I would have choosen to wake up.
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:11 am
I lived near a grainary and can tell you that I would care if the local shit plant burned down. Loss of jobs, cost to put out the fire, pollution and the changing winds.hobie16 wrote:Only if they're downwind.
Re: That's not how I would have choosen to wake up.
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 6:30 am
That might answer the question of whether or not their shit stinks or not.Cranbiz wrote:The more important question is...... If the shit plant burns in the middle of the night and nobody see's it, does anybody really care?