Amphigorey wrote:The issues surrounding Song of the South are complicated. A big problem with it is how life on a plantation was depicted; all the black characters in it are slaves, full stop, but you wouldn't necessarily know it from just watching the movie.
It would be pretty hard, seeing as the movie was set in the 1880s, long after slavery had been abolished.
Remember when Uncle Remus was told to leave? Had he been a slave he would instead have been beaten or sold. No, the blacks and poor whites in the film were not slaves.
It isn't just rich folks/poor folks; it's white people exploiting black people, and to pretend otherwise is disingenuous and cruel. That's why the movie is problematic.
No, this sort of misunderstanding of either the date of the film or the date slavery ended is the big challenge for this film. I'd really appreciate it if you would see it again with this new understanding and tell us how that changes your take on it.
I do think they should release SotS, but with commentary and perspective from scholars of African American history. That way, you get the context around the movie, and you can understand the issues that surround it. If they just released it as is, it would be confusing to people who might not have the background to understand what it's all about, and why people object to it.
Exactly! As your (not at all uncommon) misunderstanding of it demonstrates, the film has not been understood.
Sadly, those who will take to the streets in protest to a release won't watch the film or even hear those explanations first.