It's been a while but I think it was...and if it was you, GOOD FOR YOU!!! Know that at least two guests (hubby and I) were silently applauding you, and I imagine that more probably were too. I think going on the PA should be standard procedure (actually, I think ejector seats would be even better, but I suppose that doesn't jibe with safety).Euterpe wrote:I need to come on here more often... But I just read this, and if the person who told them to stop was a girl, I was probably that person! They tell us not to go on the PA and tell them to stop, but it makes me soooooo mad, so I always do it, for flash photos and for video. But it kinda makes me smile if that was me.
SGT at Soarin'
Re: SGT at Soarin'
"If you are a dee, please don't marry a dee, 'cause then your kids will be dee dee dee." ....Carlos Mencia
"It's the difference between champagne and carbonated pee!" ....Homer Simpson
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Nice work, pal
-
Euterpe
- Repeat Traveler
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 4:22 pm
- Location: Washington State
- Contact:
Re: SGT at Soarin'
Yeah, I don't know why they changed it. When I was trained at Soarin' I was told to go on the PA if people were using cameras... But then at some point a month later... they were like "No don't do that." They never really explained why, so I still do it, because it's not like there are ever managers around there anyway, and I would be ten times more annoyed by flash photography than by someone saying over the PA "This is just a reminder that there is no photography of any kind during Soarin', Thank you!"
When people take flash pictures on Pirates, I sit and yell at the backs of their heads, and I am so grateful when someone mentions that there's not photography on the PA. It doesn't happen often enough, if you ask me. Flash photography ruins most rides.
When people take flash pictures on Pirates, I sit and yell at the backs of their heads, and I am so grateful when someone mentions that there's not photography on the PA. It doesn't happen often enough, if you ask me. Flash photography ruins most rides.
Mocking Adulthood since 2004.
-
Big Wallaby
- Permanent Fixture
- Posts: 5734
- Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 7:19 pm
- Location: Vancouver, Washington
Re: SGT at Soarin'
Last several times I went on Pirates, I've set up my Speedlight as a remote, set so that it will go off if a flash goes off. Then I turn it toward the boat behind me and let them set it off. The first couple times, they wonder why the hell their camera doesn't seem to be working, then they see what is going on and generally stop.
My opinions are mine and mine only. If my opinions are the opinion of others who happen to share whatever my crazy views may be, then fine, but it's not because I represent them in having my opinions. Got it?
Re: SGT at Soarin'
I still think that it would be fun to make an array of high intensity IR LEDs that attaches to the back of my hat. Digital cameras see IR light while the human eye does not. So the camera would see bright light and set the exposure to that, causing under exposure and no flash, or just be blinded by the bright "white" light. But the light would not even be noticed by the innocent people around the SG.Big Wallaby wrote:Last several times I went on Pirates, I've set up my Speedlight as a remote, set so that it will go off if a flash goes off. Then I turn it toward the boat behind me and let them set it off. The first couple times, they wonder why the hell their camera doesn't seem to be working, then they see what is going on and generally stop.
Randy
-
Shorty82
- Should be on Payroll
- Posts: 2531
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:53 pm
- Location: The Twin Cities.
Re: SGT at Soarin'
The main problem with that is that it would also play havoc with the cameras the operators use to keep an eye on things. They'd see a bright light and probably would make announcements to turn the light off.Randy B wrote:I still think that it would be fun to make an array of high intensity IR LEDs that attaches to the back of my hat. Digital cameras see IR light while the human eye does not. So the camera would see bright light and set the exposure to that, causing under exposure and no flash, or just be blinded by the bright "white" light. But the light would not even be noticed by the innocent people around the SG.
Randy
Around here, however, we don’t look backwards for very long.
We keep moving forward, opening up new doors and doing new things, because we're curious…
and curiosity keeps leading us down new paths.
-Walt Disney
:wwwd:
Keep moving forward
We keep moving forward, opening up new doors and doing new things, because we're curious…
and curiosity keeps leading us down new paths.
-Walt Disney
:wwwd:
Keep moving forward
Re: SGT at Soarin'
Ok, then what about this. Replace the flash tube from that slave flash that was being used to "get the point across" with the IR array. It would only "flash" when the other flash was going off and cause the photos to be over exposed. It would only go off when the flash was going off (which the CMs are apparently ignoring) and would still not blind any innocents.Shorty82 wrote:The main problem with that is that it would also play havoc with the cameras the operators use to keep an eye on things. They'd see a bright light and probably would make announcements to turn the light off.
Randy
-
GRUMPY PIRATE
- Permanent Fixture
- Posts: 8780
- Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 11:23 am
- Location: Insane Diego
Re: SGT at Soarin'
Sounds like you guys need an IR "firefly" that attaches to a 9 volt battery, and is used to "mark' things in the dark!Randy B wrote:Ok, then what about this. Replace the flash tube from that slave flash that was being used to "get the point across" with the IR array. It would only "flash" when the other flash was going off and cause the photos to be over exposed. It would only go off when the flash was going off (which the CMs are apparently ignoring) and would still not blind any innocents.
Randy
They come in VERY handy at times!
:pirateflaARRRRRRR YA DOIN'?