Of course, over on certain boards, there are a few whining about it (Disney is for kids, how can you ban them?)

I mentioned in a post that I thought it might be nice for Disney to institute this same restriction on a restaurant that did not have a $300 tab for 2 at the end of the meal. Maybe 1 or 2 of the signature restaurants.
One lady's 9 yr old is a foodie. Now that I understand, but it would not kill him to wait 1 year to eat there. DD15 is a foodie, but she won't be able to eat at Palo for 3 years. She is getting through it without needing therapy.
But someone else said they eat at a signature every night and if Disney made them over 10 only, they would have to leave their toddler in the room and that is "Not a family vacation."
Listen...we are foodies. We have 4 kids, 2 under 5. You know what we do? WE FOREGO SIGNATURE RESTAURANTS when the kids are with us. Don't want to leave your 3 yr old in the room? Don't eat at the 10 and up restaurant, then. Good lord. Would it kill ya to skip a signature meal to spend time with your kid?

If this offends anyone, sorry, but it just irks me. People bring their kids to everything. Reminds me of Liar Liar. "You brought your kids to your divorce??"