Amusing Menu Item or Copyright Infringement?

This is a general discussion. If your topic doesn't fit anywhere else, put it here.
Post Reply
User avatar
PatchOBlack
Seasoned Pro
Seasoned Pro
Posts: 911
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 3:07 pm

Amusing Menu Item or Copyright Infringement?

Post by PatchOBlack » Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:54 pm

For Father's Day, my family went out to Mimi's Cafe for lunch. While we were there, my brother noticed a breakfast item on the kid's menu: pancakes in a rather familiar shape. These were called "Mimi Mouse Pancakes", and can be seen at http://www.mimiscafe.com/MenuKids.aspx. We chuckled about this, and how we could just see someone getting a little phone call from the Disney Legal Team.... :cat1:



darph nader
Permanent Fixture
Permanent Fixture
Posts: 4844
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 9:16 pm

Re: Amusing Menu Item or Copyright Infringement?

Post by darph nader » Mon Jun 21, 2010 6:48 pm

I'll make the g-kids 'mouse' pancakes from time to time,big deal.


Beer....The reason I get up every,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,afternoon.

DisneyMom
Permanent Fixture
Permanent Fixture
Posts: 5002
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 7:14 pm
Park: DLR Guest
Department: Churro Inspection
Position: In Line for POTC

Re: Amusing Menu Item or Copyright Infringement?

Post by DisneyMom » Mon Jun 21, 2010 8:31 pm

Hmmmm....I wonder if the Mickey Icon shape originated with the licensed character, or if the shape pre-existed? :confused:

Maybe there are some ancient petroglyphs with that shape! ;)


:flybongo: NO BULL!!!!!:D:

Mr. M
Repeat Traveler
Repeat Traveler
Posts: 92
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:32 pm

Re: Amusing Menu Item or Copyright Infringement?

Post by Mr. M » Mon Jun 21, 2010 8:41 pm

I see nothing wrong. they are not calling them Mickey, or Minnie. They are not claiming to be a part of Disney. I think Disney is smart enough to not care.


Mental note: Do not ever ask questions on SGT.com
Will result in getting treated like scum.

Goofyernmost
Practically Lives Here
Practically Lives Here
Posts: 1126
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 6:31 pm
Location: North Carolina

Re: Amusing Menu Item or Copyright Infringement?

Post by Goofyernmost » Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:00 pm

Mr. M wrote:I see nothing wrong. they are not calling them Mickey, or Minnie. They are not claiming to be a part of Disney. I think Disney is smart enough to not care.
Oh, think again...I know a local day care that had a wall mural with a Mickey Mouse in it and they received a letter from Disney saying get rid of it or get sued.

I have no idea how they even found out about it.


:goofy: :goofy:

User avatar
hobie16
Permanent Fixture
Permanent Fixture
Posts: 10546
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 4:45 pm
Park: DLR
Department: Fruity Drink Land
Position: Mai Tai Face Plant
Location: 717 Miles NNW Of DLR

Re: Amusing Menu Item or Copyright Infringement?

Post by hobie16 » Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:36 pm

Goofyernmost wrote:Oh, think again...I know a local day care that had a wall mural with a Mickey Mouse in it and they received a letter from Disney saying get rid of it or get sued.

I have no idea how they even found out about it.
Mickey, like Elvis, is everywhere.


Image

Don't be fooled by appearances. In Hawaii, some of the most powerful people look like bums and stuntmen.
--- Matt King


Stay low and run in a zigzag pattern.

Mr. M
Repeat Traveler
Repeat Traveler
Posts: 92
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:32 pm

Re: Amusing Menu Item or Copyright Infringement?

Post by Mr. M » Mon Jun 21, 2010 10:04 pm

Goofyernmost wrote:Oh, think again...I know a local day care that had a wall mural with a Mickey Mouse in it and they received a letter from Disney saying get rid of it or get sued.

I have no idea how they even found out about it.
Yeah Yeah everyone talks about the daycare wall. :rolleyes: Disney messed up BIG on that one. I think Disney wised up after that and pulled the pixie dust out of their butts.



BTW The daycare painted over the wall, WB cam in a painted baby Bugs Bunny and friends for free.


Mental note: Do not ever ask questions on SGT.com
Will result in getting treated like scum.

User avatar
Main Streeter
Permanent Fixture
Permanent Fixture
Posts: 4608
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 6:10 am
Location: D L
Contact:

Re: Amusing Menu Item or Copyright Infringement?

Post by Main Streeter » Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:24 am

hobie16 wrote:Mickey, like Elvis, is everywhere.
:hysteria: Always love hobie one liners!



"You work here? You must be SO rich!"


RESCUE A PET! [font="Arial Black"]Within the heart of every stray Lies the singular desire to be loved.[/font]

User avatar
Lasolimu
Practically Lives Here
Practically Lives Here
Posts: 1509
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 12:46 am
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: Amusing Menu Item or Copyright Infringement?

Post by Lasolimu » Tue Jun 22, 2010 7:57 am

At my local amusement park this year, they spent a lot of money updating and fixing things around the park. Well, one day we rode a haunted house ride and, wouldn't you know it, there was a line that sounded very familiar. It was the line Barbossa used to taunt Ms. Swann in the first Pirates movie the first night she is on the Black Pearl, "You best start believing in ghost stories, you're in one." I probably wouldn't even have noticed, but it sounded like it was ripped straight from the movie with the Ms. Turner bit edited out. :eek:


There's no place like 127.0.0.1

User avatar
PatchOBlack
Seasoned Pro
Seasoned Pro
Posts: 911
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 3:07 pm

Re: Amusing Menu Item or Copyright Infringement?

Post by PatchOBlack » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:33 pm

darph nader wrote:I'll make the g-kids 'mouse' pancakes from time to time,big deal.
There is a big difference between making "mouse" pancakes at home for the kids, and putting them on the menu of a chain of restaurants.
Mr. M wrote:I see nothing wrong. they are not calling them Mickey, or Minnie. They are not claiming to be a part of Disney. I think Disney is smart enough to not care.
Consider this: Copyright infringement isn't limited to exact carbon copies. It also covers when another person makes a product so similar that it can lead to brand confusion. The look of these pancakes, as well as the name of the item ("Mimi Mouse Pancakes"), seems to be more than a little inspired by the famous Mickey Mouse Pancakes. If Disney has the rights to the iconic silhouette of Mickey's head, that would likely strengthen their case. As to Disney not caring, well, it may be small potatoes, but copyright law demands that the holder of a copyright actively protects his rights, or else he could lose them.



Post Reply