Page 1 of 2

Fashion Police Blotter

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:08 am
by Zazu
Sunday. December 8th. Location? Magic Kingdom; Adventureland; opposite the Dole Whip shop.

Suspect was seen walking past. Her attire? Black tights. Very tight. Over a Pooh-sized boat. So tight you could see what color underwear she had on.

It was neon green.
:jawdrop:

Medical assistance was provided to the victims.

The suspect was convicted in absentia for a violation of the dress code: see-through attire without something interesting to see.

The story you have just read is true. Nothing has been changed because there were no innocents.

Re: Fashion Police Blotter

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 2:28 pm
by Big Wallaby
I can see it in my mind. This is bad enough.

Thank you for taking one for the team and actually witnessing this.

Re: Fashion Police Blotter

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 9:34 pm
by hobie16
Aarrggghhhhh! I've gone virtually blind. :bigeyes:

Re: Fashion Police Blotter

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 9:53 pm
by darph nader
And I'm sure she thought she looked like a 'babe'. :bigeyes:

Re: Fashion Police Blotter

Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 12:03 pm
by BRWombat
It's tempting to try shooting Clorox into my ear with a squeeze bulb, but I guess even that won't erase this image from my brain. Thanks, Z! :rolleyes:

Re: Fashion Police Blotter

Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:27 pm
by felinefan
This morning, before leaving the library for lunch, I saw a tall person in a long coat and heeled women's boots. As I passed by to get to the ladies' room, I looked, and I swear I saw facial hair and masculine features! I was trying not to be rude--or get punched for staring--so I didn't get that good of a look, but still! Orange is fairly conservative, so how he got around without getting some comments is unknown. :jawdrop:

Re: Fashion Police Blotter

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 7:35 am
by WEDFan
So, I just got back from the World (more SGTs to come), but I definitely noticed the trend to yoga pants (basically tights.) I know I'm getting old because my basic response is, "I don't get it." Sure, many of the women wearing them had very nice bodies and/or booties, but still, why would you choose something that leaves so very little to the imagination? I imagine similar things have been said through the ages like when women started showing their ankles and then their legs, but I just don't get it.

And, yes, for every smoking body in the yoga pants, there was at least one dubious choice and one such as started this thread.

Re: Fashion Police Blotter

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 7:51 am
by YANXWIN
WEDFan wrote:And, yes, for every smoking body in the yoga pants, there was at least one dubious choice and one such as started this thread.
I think you have a flawed statistic. Far less "hot" bodies.

Re: Fashion Police Blotter

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 8:41 am
by WEDFan
YANXWIN wrote:
WEDFan wrote:And, yes, for every smoking body in the yoga pants, there was at least one dubious choice and one such as started this thread.
I think you have a flawed statistic. Far less "hot" bodies.
I wouldn't call it an actual statistic. More of a gross estimation to convey a point. I won't argue with your assessment.

Of course, I have little room to talk as I would certainly strike people blind were I to dress in anything remotely like yoga pants.

Re: Fashion Police Blotter

Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:47 am
by Big Wallaby
WEDFan wrote:I would certainly strike people blind were I to dress in anything remotely like yoga pants.
Somehow, the song just wouldn't work if the lyrics were

We're men
We're manly men!
We're men in yoga pants
Yoga pants, yoga pants yoga pants...

But that is probably what the song and movie would have to be today...