When I said the "didn't have a leg to stand on", I meant if they cannot prove what is happening there isn't much they can do. I think that these people are pretty confident about it since they so blatantly advertise the service. I would think that Disney would have to actually plant people to get any proof at all. Will Disney be willing to spend the money to catch them? I suspect it depends on how long this is in focus or how quickly it can be swept under the rug.WEDFan wrote:Well, hopefully the team who monitors social media and web for various legal infringements will now have new criteria to look for including hiring out your enhanced access. Not sure about them not having a leg to stand on, though. I think it must violate the terms and conditions of admission to be charging guests for services on Disney property. Bodyguards, personal assistants, etc. are engaged by a person in a context outside of a Disney visit, so if they are getting paid for services on Disney property it is a different matter than providing Disney specific services in competition with DIsney itself.
Hire the Handicapped?
-
- Practically Lives Here
- Posts: 1126
- Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 6:31 pm
- Location: North Carolina
Re: Hire the Handicapped?
:goofy: :goofy:
- Zazu
- Permanent Fixture
- Posts: 4133
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 3:00 pm
- Park: WDW
- Position: retired
- Location: 8 miles east of Spaceship Earth
- Contact:
Re: Hire the Handicapped?
Disney, like all other businesses, has the right to refuse service to anyone for any non-discriminatory reason, or for no reason at all. Perceived abuse of the GAC is a legally defensible reason, and the presence of a real handicap does not change that.
After all, stupidity is certainly a handicap, and Disney tosses lots of stupid guests (and more than a few stupid cast members)!
After all, stupidity is certainly a handicap, and Disney tosses lots of stupid guests (and more than a few stupid cast members)!
Zazu
Re: Hire the Handicapped?
What if the handicapped were giving tours to other handicapped?Zazu wrote:Disney, like all other businesses, has the right to refuse service to anyone for any non-discriminatory reason, or for no reason at all. Perceived abuse of the GAC is a legally defensible reason, and the presence of a real handicap does not change that.
After all, stupidity is certainly a handicap, and Disney tosses lots of stupid guests (and more than a few stupid cast members)!
Corey
Re: Hire the Handicapped?
Then I should think that they would not be abusing their GAC card. The other guests would have one of their own and it would be just a normal tour group.drcorey wrote:What if the handicapped were giving tours to other handicapped?