Page 1 of 2

Stupid In The Parks

Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:37 pm
by drcorey
People asking Where is Princess Giselle?
Duh people, didn't they watch the whole movie?
She didn't marry the prince, She stayed with the guy who helped her.

Re: Stupid In The Parks

Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 1:01 pm
by PatchOBlack
drcorey wrote:People asking Where is Princess Giselle?
Duh people, didn't they watch the whole movie?
She didn't marry the prince, She stayed with the guy who helped her.
Eh...I would give folks a pass on that. I mean, when the movie first came out, she was presented as Disney's latest princess. Even if she doesn't end up marrying the princess and therefore isn't "really" a princess, she still may be considered a Disney princess.

Re: Stupid In The Parks

Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 12:27 am
by GRUMPY PIRATE
Wouldn't the girfriend that DID go back and marry the prince be considered a princess?

Re: Stupid In The Parks

Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 12:56 am
by drcorey
GRUMPY PIRATE wrote:Wouldn't the girfriend that DID go back and marry the prince be considered a princess?
yes. but not Giselle.
and most people can't even remember her name now.
no dolls of her, no toys of her, no costumes of her.

Re: Stupid In The Parks

Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 12:30 pm
by GRUMPY PIRATE
drcorey wrote:yes. but not Giselle.
and most people can't even remember her name now.
no dolls of her, no toys of her, no costumes of her.
I guess princess nancy didn't make that big of a hit in Andalasia!

Re: Stupid In The Parks

Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:57 pm
by PatchOBlack
Now, to be fair, Enchanted wasn't exactly the "modern classic" Disney hoped it would be. So, I can understand both the lack of merchandise and such at Disney's shops and parks, and the fact that many people don't remember Giselle's name (or that, officially, she never really married into the title of "princess").

Re: Stupid In The Parks

Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 8:39 pm
by Nobleman
How about they just sell a life-size inflatable Amy Adams doll in the Emporium and we call it even?

Re: Stupid In The Parks

Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:03 am
by Ms. Matterhorn
Wait. I saw that movie. I thought she was already a princess before she was going to marry Prince Humperdinck or whatever-his-name-was. Am I confused. BTW, I love that movie. It's funny. But I don't think it could ever become a Disney classic because it is too satirical. JMHO.

Re: Stupid In The Parks

Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 9:44 pm
by DisneyMom
Ms. Matterhorn wrote:Wait. I saw that movie. I thought she was already a princess before she was going to marry Prince Humperdinck or whatever-his-name-was. Am I confused. BTW, I love that movie. It's funny. But I don't think it could ever become a Disney classic because it is too satirical. JMHO.
It was Prince Edward ;)
But in the Princess Bride, Buttercup was going to get the title when she married Prince Humperdinck,so maybe in Fairy Tales that's all you have to do and not be of Royal Birth.....I think I heard when "Commoner" Kate marries William,she will only become a "Lady" :cool:

Re: Stupid In The Parks

Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 10:37 pm
by Ms. Matterhorn
Well, that's weird, because Diana was a pre-school teacher and she became a princess when she married Charles, and Sarah Ferguson became a princess, but I don't think that old bag Camilla Bowles is a princess.

Kate should at least become the Duchess of Grand Fenwick or some such nonsense.