Page 1 of 5

Are we allowed..

Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 9:55 am
by Ice Bear
........ posting pictures of guests cough doing real stupid things? :D:

Re: Are we allowed..

Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 12:03 pm
by Mayonnaise
Topic and text....

.... not making a sentence.

8^P

Re: Are we allowed..

Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 1:22 pm
by PatchOBlack
Mayonnaise wrote:Topic and text....

.... not making a sentence.

8^P
I believe Ice Bear merely left out the word "to" and used the wrong form of "post", so that it would be read:

Are we allowed...

...to post pictures of guests cough doing real stupid things?

Of course, this doesn't actually answer his question. :cat1:

Re: Are we allowed..

Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 1:46 pm
by CujoSR
Ice Bear wrote:........ posting pictures of guests cough doing real stupid things? :D:
That is a good question. I'll mull this over with the rest of the SGT staff and get back to you.

Re: Are we allowed..

Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 6:21 pm
by kurtisnelson
CujoSR wrote:That is a good question. I'll mull this over with the rest of the SGT staff and get back to you.
I'll just give the blanket warning that if you are a CM, it is a very bad idea.

Re: Are we allowed..

Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 6:28 pm
by Main Streeter
Ice Bear wrote:posting pictures of guests coughing
Must be out of it today, but why would coughing be fuuny or worth pix? Just a 2 cent post. :rolleyes:

Re: Are we allowed..

Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 7:08 pm
by CBeilby
I'm obviously not a lawyer, but it seems to me that doing this would possibly open the site up to possible legal actions. Wombat, what's your take on this?

Re: Are we allowed..

Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 9:15 pm
by CujoSR
CBeilby wrote:I'm obviously not a lawyer, but it seems to me that doing this would possibly open the site up to possible legal actions. Wombat, what's your take on this?
I believe Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act would cover the site from any legal proceedings. That said IF (and I stess the if right now) pics were allowed to be posted I would require faces to be blured unlike the photos of the SGs walking the peoplemover over on board X.

Re: Are we allowed..

Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 9:33 pm
by Disneyguy85
CujoSR wrote:That said IF (and I stess the if right now) pics were allowed to be posted I would require faces to be blured
Yes, I think that would be best.

Re: Are we allowed..

Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 10:45 am
by Philosoraptor
I'd have to agree with kurtisnelson. If you're a CM I wouldn't recommend it, because who's to say you didn't get the picture while on stage?