Are we allowed..
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 9:55 am
........ posting pictures of guests cough doing real stupid things? :D:
Stories about guest behavior in theme parks.
https://unclewalts.com/forum/
I believe Ice Bear merely left out the word "to" and used the wrong form of "post", so that it would be read:Mayonnaise wrote:Topic and text....
.... not making a sentence.
8^P
That is a good question. I'll mull this over with the rest of the SGT staff and get back to you.Ice Bear wrote:........ posting pictures of guests cough doing real stupid things? :D:
I'll just give the blanket warning that if you are a CM, it is a very bad idea.CujoSR wrote:That is a good question. I'll mull this over with the rest of the SGT staff and get back to you.
Must be out of it today, but why would coughing be fuuny or worth pix? Just a 2 cent post.Ice Bear wrote:posting pictures of guests coughing
I believe Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act would cover the site from any legal proceedings. That said IF (and I stess the if right now) pics were allowed to be posted I would require faces to be blured unlike the photos of the SGs walking the peoplemover over on board X.CBeilby wrote:I'm obviously not a lawyer, but it seems to me that doing this would possibly open the site up to possible legal actions. Wombat, what's your take on this?
Yes, I think that would be best.CujoSR wrote:That said IF (and I stess the if right now) pics were allowed to be posted I would require faces to be blured