Stupid Guest Tricks

Kifaru wrote:see, if she'd been breastfeeding it wouldn't be an issue...


:eatpopcn: :eatpopcn:

boom-chicka-wah-wah!!!

Mayonnaise wrote:Rights pamphlet? Where did you get a Rights Pamphlet? I'm looking at the Constitution here and no where does it say I have the Right to bring anything into anyone's Private Property that they don't want there.

8^S

pamplet? yeah, a pamplet sure sounds like it would cover ALL rights in great detail.

hehehehhehehee

Actually, I once read about a woman who was not allowed to bring bottles of breast milk she had pumped for her baby to feed it during the flight. They actually made her dispose of it. She didn't want to nurse him during the flight for whatever reason (modesty, I suppose), and despite her protests and explanations, she still had to discard it. Sometimes I think entities overstep their bounds and overdo the "security" thing. Seriously, how could breast milk look like something potentially hazardous?

And guys, let's not spend too much time arguing polemics, okay? You know what happens--we end up getting that little padlock icon on the thread.

Though the few times I've flown, I've enjoyed the experience very much, but I agree with something Zazu once said--I don't want to use a form of transportation that considers me to be a terrorist. Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty? And several terrorists have managed to get past security and do their thing anyway. Frankly, I'd prefer to take a train over a plane nowadays. You get to see more.

ktulu wrote:I think someone is back with a new account...

I was sure of that two weeks ago, so I ignore listed him back then.

Mayonnaise wrote:Rights pamphlet? Where did you get a Rights Pamphlet?

GRUMPY PIRATE wrote:pamplet? yeah, a pamplet sure sounds like it would cover ALL rights in great detail.

hehehehhehehee

That was the point.

Mr. M wrote:That was the point.

I think your point is a bit blunted*.

and moot...

or a moo point if you like cows.





*not to be corn-fused with bluntman

CBeilby wrote:I was sure of that two weeks ago, so I ignore listed him back then.

Capital idea. Might as well try out this feature.

ktulu wrote:I think someone is back with a new account...

Only the server logs know for sure.

hobie16 wrote:Only the server logs know for sure.

...As foretold by the prophecy.

hobie16 wrote:Only the server logs know for sure.

Disneyguy85 wrote:...As foretold by the prophecy.

By the great sages of old, no doubt.

PatchOBlack wrote:By the great sages of old, no doubt.

A quandry it is, Ummmm?