EeyoresButterfly wrote:The PRT sounds really neat, I think I would like to see that! I can pretty much take or leave the monorail. I only enjoy riding it if I can be in front and see the track. It's similar to my flying issue, the idea of lack of control. I don't like being in the regular cars and not being able to see the rail that is supporting me. I always have this vision in my head of guests deciding to all go to the same side at the same time and the monorail falling of the tracks. (I know it can't happen, but I still think of it).
I had a really bad monorail experience my first CP. I was by myself in a car and there were apparently some very unruly children upfront? How did I know this? The intercom was on the whole time. I could hear the kids screaming and the driver and mother trying to get them to sit down and behave. It was quite frightening. The worst was when I heard the driver say, "Don't touch that" and then the mother said, "Look, now you broke it." We stopped almost immediately after that exchange and sat there for five minutes with no reason given. I got off that monorail in tears and avoided them for a long time after that.
Wow that is a bad first experience! I hope that your experiences with them since then have been positive enough to let you relax and enjoy the ride a bit more.
On the other hand, as a person with a long-time exposure to the monorails who is quite comfortable with them, I think that being in that precise situation, in a compartment
by myself with no control, but yet being able to hear everything in the cab, I might have been quite amused by the whole situation (as long as I wasn't running late for something).
As for the overall "state of the monorials", monorail vs. PRT side of this thread. I would not mind PRT replacing monorail
as long as it was done right.
I guess the key argument in a monorail vs. PRT debate might be the same crush times loading factor Zazu mentioned. Do we know the numbers for what the monorail system currently in place can do (I'm sure Disney does)?
Also at LEAST for the current monorail served route upgrading the monorails to maximize their capacity and minimize the man hours of labor required should be considered first, after all if they were to decide on PRT it probably would make sense to serve other areas first in conjunction with the monorail. One issue that MIGHT be much more expensive with PRT is the percentage of system cost need to be used to prepare for emergency system evacuations and power failures, since you would have a large number of individual units to "tow off" or evacuate in place, still even if they just did an expanded and improved monorail system many of those same changes would be needed too (more mule/tugs, stationed in more places for one thing) . If PRT can and is chosen to do it all that would be great too, but getting it done right is always the thing isn't it? Still I would be more hopeful than fearful once I see things moving forward, and the problems in the replacement process of the monorails at Disneyland just ***MIGHT*** make them a little more careful in planning some of those details that count in "doing it right".