Another one bites the dust

News about Theme Parks and their parent companies.
Locked
User avatar
ktulu
Permanent Fixture
Permanent Fixture
Posts: 4150
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 1:01 pm
Park: ktululand
Department: Custodial
Position: Janitor
Location: Texas
Contact:

Re: Another one bites the dust

Post by ktulu » Sat May 29, 2010 10:20 pm

kurtisnelson wrote:Tread carefully or you might get put in a padded cell for a week again.
It'd be worth it, again :)


"People can drink coke and pepsi, but they can't pee in the street."

812114

CptnSkippy
Regular Guest
Regular Guest
Posts: 339
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 1:53 pm
Department: F&B
Location: South FL

Re: Another one bites the dust

Post by CptnSkippy » Sun May 30, 2010 3:25 am

Honda Enoch wrote: The play ground is being MOVED to another location. Pooh is going to have a rather LARGE plot in the new expansion.
Image


Parties of 33 should consider dividing their parties into two groups of 16 and a half each.

User avatar
Main Streeter
Permanent Fixture
Permanent Fixture
Posts: 4608
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 6:10 am
Location: D L
Contact:

Re: Another one bites the dust

Post by Main Streeter » Sun May 30, 2010 4:10 am

ktulu wrote:it'd be worth it, again :)
rofl. ;)



"You work here? You must be SO rich!"


RESCUE A PET! [font="Arial Black"]Within the heart of every stray Lies the singular desire to be loved.[/font]

Honda Enoch
Regular Guest
Regular Guest
Posts: 383
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 4:57 am
Location: a place beyond beds and bath

Re: Another one bites the dust

Post by Honda Enoch » Sun May 30, 2010 11:50 am

CptnSkippy wrote:Image
1) this is not Wikipedia.

2)
Honda Enoch wrote:See the disney parks blog they posted a video about it last week.

In this video they talk about moving the pooh tree to the center of the larger Pooh area.
http://disneyparks.disney.go.com/blog/2 ... -recap-30/

Not to mention this blue print of the expansion.
Image


"You know me. I'm that little voice inside that tells you..."

Image

darph nader
Permanent Fixture
Permanent Fixture
Posts: 4844
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 9:16 pm

Re: Another one bites the dust

Post by darph nader » Sun May 30, 2010 12:20 pm

Honda Enoch wrote:

In this video they talk about moving the pooh tree to the center of the larger Pooh area.
That just sounds soooo wrong. :rolleyes:


Beer....The reason I get up every,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,afternoon.

Disneyguy85
Practically Lives Here
Practically Lives Here
Posts: 1143
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 4:55 pm
Location: CA

Re: Another one bites the dust

Post by Disneyguy85 » Sun May 30, 2010 12:49 pm

I sense another "Duck season, Rabbit season" fate for this thread...

By the way, I don't want to beat a dead horse, but since this was touched upon recently, I must go back to a previous discussion and make a point;

In the following link, it states that Walt Disney initially did not want to built a magic kindgom park in Florida, his big idea for the Florida project was EPCOT.

http://sites.google.com/site/theorigina ... da-project


"Walt Disney was not able to obtain funding and permission to start work on his Florida property until he agreed to build the Magic Kingdom first."

"Walt never wanted to make a "sequel" to Disneyland, always stating that there will always be one Disneyland. When Walt presented his ideas to the Board of Directors, they were skeptical. They wanted assurance that people would come to visit this "Disney World". What they wanted was a surefire hit: a Disneyland-style park.
Walt initially objected, but eventually relented, and he used the park to his advantage. He put the theme park in the northmost corner of the Florida property. Disney wanted everyone to experience the rest."


Thank you, you may resume your previous argument. ;)



User avatar
hobie16
Permanent Fixture
Permanent Fixture
Posts: 10546
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 4:45 pm
Park: DLR
Department: Fruity Drink Land
Position: Mai Tai Face Plant
Location: 717 Miles NNW Of DLR

Re: Another one bites the dust

Post by hobie16 » Sun May 30, 2010 1:57 pm

Disneyguy85 wrote:When Walt presented his ideas to the Board of Directors, they were skeptical. They wanted assurance that people would come to visit this "Disney World". What they wanted was a surefire hit: a Disneyland-style park.
And there we have the downside of going public. The visionary vs. The Board. :eek:


Image

Don't be fooled by appearances. In Hawaii, some of the most powerful people look like bums and stuntmen.
--- Matt King


Stay low and run in a zigzag pattern.

Honda Enoch
Regular Guest
Regular Guest
Posts: 383
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 4:57 am
Location: a place beyond beds and bath

Re: Another one bites the dust

Post by Honda Enoch » Sun May 30, 2010 4:45 pm

Disneyguy85 wrote:I sense another "Duck season, Rabbit season" fate for this thread...
How so? The facts were just posted. End of discussion.

Disneyguy85 wrote:By the way, I don't want to beat a dead horse, but since this was touched upon recently, I must go back to a previous discussion and make a point;

In the following link, it states that Walt Disney initially did not want to built a magic kindgom park in Florida, his big idea for the Florida project was EPCOT.

http://sites.google.com/site/theorigina ... da-project


"Walt Disney was not able to obtain funding and permission to start work on his Florida property until he agreed to build the Magic Kingdom first."

"Walt never wanted to make a "sequel" to Disneyland, always stating that there will always be one Disneyland. When Walt presented his ideas to the Board of Directors, they were skeptical. They wanted assurance that people would come to visit this "Disney World". What they wanted was a surefire hit: a Disneyland-style park.
Walt initially objected, but eventually relented, and he used the park to his advantage. He put the theme park in the northmost corner of the Florida property. Disney wanted everyone to experience the rest."


Thank you, you may resume your previous argument. ;)
Sorry but that's incorrect. Walt had started plans for a Disney park in FL ever since he saw the mistakes made with DL. Check the videos of him talking about the Florida Project. He shows the area for the park, then goes into "And by far the biggest plans for the Florida Project is.... E.P.C.O.T."


"You know me. I'm that little voice inside that tells you..."

Image

Disneyguy85
Practically Lives Here
Practically Lives Here
Posts: 1143
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 4:55 pm
Location: CA

Re: Another one bites the dust

Post by Disneyguy85 » Sun May 30, 2010 4:57 pm

hobie16 wrote:And there we have the downside of going public. The visionary vs. The Board.
That sounds like a case I'd love to see on Judge Judy or The People's Court! :D:



User avatar
hobie16
Permanent Fixture
Permanent Fixture
Posts: 10546
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 4:45 pm
Park: DLR
Department: Fruity Drink Land
Position: Mai Tai Face Plant
Location: 717 Miles NNW Of DLR

Re: Another one bites the dust

Post by hobie16 » Sun May 30, 2010 5:34 pm

Disneyguy85 wrote:That sounds like a case I'd love to see on Judge Judy or The People's Court! :D:
It's really more the case of a visionary (Walt) coming up with an idea but not having the capital to make it real. There are two sources, loan(s) or equity (stock). Loans can be paid off but equity seemingly lasts forever.

With equity you also need someone to represent the stockholders. That would be the board. The board will usually do a good job of representing the stockholders because they get paid in stock thus becoming representatives of their own interests.

In the case of building WDW, Walt had a vision (EPCOT) but the board wanted a proven concept (MK). Both eventually got what they wanted. More or less.


Image

Don't be fooled by appearances. In Hawaii, some of the most powerful people look like bums and stuntmen.
--- Matt King


Stay low and run in a zigzag pattern.

Locked