It'd be worth it, again :)kurtisnelson wrote:Tread carefully or you might get put in a padded cell for a week again.
Another one bites the dust
- ktulu
- Permanent Fixture
- Posts: 4150
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 1:01 pm
- Park: ktululand
- Department: Custodial
- Position: Janitor
- Location: Texas
- Contact:
Re: Another one bites the dust
"People can drink coke and pepsi, but they can't pee in the street."
812114
812114
-
- Regular Guest
- Posts: 339
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 1:53 pm
- Department: F&B
- Location: South FL
Re: Another one bites the dust
Honda Enoch wrote: The play ground is being MOVED to another location. Pooh is going to have a rather LARGE plot in the new expansion.

Parties of 33 should consider dividing their parties into two groups of 16 and a half each.
- Main Streeter
- Permanent Fixture
- Posts: 4608
- Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 6:10 am
- Location: D L
- Contact:
Re: Another one bites the dust
rofl. ;)ktulu wrote:it'd be worth it, again :)
"You work here? You must be SO rich!"
RESCUE A PET! [font="Arial Black"]Within the heart of every stray Lies the singular desire to be loved.[/font]
-
- Regular Guest
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 4:57 am
- Location: a place beyond beds and bath
Re: Another one bites the dust
1) this is not Wikipedia.CptnSkippy wrote:
2)
Honda Enoch wrote:See the disney parks blog they posted a video about it last week.
In this video they talk about moving the pooh tree to the center of the larger Pooh area.
http://disneyparks.disney.go.com/blog/2 ... -recap-30/
Not to mention this blue print of the expansion.

"You know me. I'm that little voice inside that tells you..."


-
- Permanent Fixture
- Posts: 4844
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 9:16 pm
Re: Another one bites the dust
That just sounds soooo wrong.Honda Enoch wrote:
In this video they talk about moving the pooh tree to the center of the larger Pooh area.

Beer....The reason I get up every,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,afternoon.
-
- Practically Lives Here
- Posts: 1143
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 4:55 pm
- Location: CA
Re: Another one bites the dust
I sense another "Duck season, Rabbit season" fate for this thread...
By the way, I don't want to beat a dead horse, but since this was touched upon recently, I must go back to a previous discussion and make a point;
In the following link, it states that Walt Disney initially did not want to built a magic kindgom park in Florida, his big idea for the Florida project was EPCOT.
http://sites.google.com/site/theorigina ... da-project
"Walt Disney was not able to obtain funding and permission to start work on his Florida property until he agreed to build the Magic Kingdom first."
"Walt never wanted to make a "sequel" to Disneyland, always stating that there will always be one Disneyland. When Walt presented his ideas to the Board of Directors, they were skeptical. They wanted assurance that people would come to visit this "Disney World". What they wanted was a surefire hit: a Disneyland-style park.
Walt initially objected, but eventually relented, and he used the park to his advantage. He put the theme park in the northmost corner of the Florida property. Disney wanted everyone to experience the rest."
Thank you, you may resume your previous argument. ;)
By the way, I don't want to beat a dead horse, but since this was touched upon recently, I must go back to a previous discussion and make a point;
In the following link, it states that Walt Disney initially did not want to built a magic kindgom park in Florida, his big idea for the Florida project was EPCOT.
http://sites.google.com/site/theorigina ... da-project
"Walt Disney was not able to obtain funding and permission to start work on his Florida property until he agreed to build the Magic Kingdom first."
"Walt never wanted to make a "sequel" to Disneyland, always stating that there will always be one Disneyland. When Walt presented his ideas to the Board of Directors, they were skeptical. They wanted assurance that people would come to visit this "Disney World". What they wanted was a surefire hit: a Disneyland-style park.
Walt initially objected, but eventually relented, and he used the park to his advantage. He put the theme park in the northmost corner of the Florida property. Disney wanted everyone to experience the rest."
Thank you, you may resume your previous argument. ;)
- hobie16
- Permanent Fixture
- Posts: 10546
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 4:45 pm
- Park: DLR
- Department: Fruity Drink Land
- Position: Mai Tai Face Plant
- Location: 717 Miles NNW Of DLR
Re: Another one bites the dust
And there we have the downside of going public. The visionary vs. The Board.Disneyguy85 wrote:When Walt presented his ideas to the Board of Directors, they were skeptical. They wanted assurance that people would come to visit this "Disney World". What they wanted was a surefire hit: a Disneyland-style park.


Don't be fooled by appearances. In Hawaii, some of the most powerful people look like bums and stuntmen.
--- Matt King
Stay low and run in a zigzag pattern.
-
- Regular Guest
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 4:57 am
- Location: a place beyond beds and bath
Re: Another one bites the dust
How so? The facts were just posted. End of discussion.Disneyguy85 wrote:I sense another "Duck season, Rabbit season" fate for this thread...
Sorry but that's incorrect. Walt had started plans for a Disney park in FL ever since he saw the mistakes made with DL. Check the videos of him talking about the Florida Project. He shows the area for the park, then goes into "And by far the biggest plans for the Florida Project is.... E.P.C.O.T."Disneyguy85 wrote:By the way, I don't want to beat a dead horse, but since this was touched upon recently, I must go back to a previous discussion and make a point;
In the following link, it states that Walt Disney initially did not want to built a magic kindgom park in Florida, his big idea for the Florida project was EPCOT.
http://sites.google.com/site/theorigina ... da-project
"Walt Disney was not able to obtain funding and permission to start work on his Florida property until he agreed to build the Magic Kingdom first."
"Walt never wanted to make a "sequel" to Disneyland, always stating that there will always be one Disneyland. When Walt presented his ideas to the Board of Directors, they were skeptical. They wanted assurance that people would come to visit this "Disney World". What they wanted was a surefire hit: a Disneyland-style park.
Walt initially objected, but eventually relented, and he used the park to his advantage. He put the theme park in the northmost corner of the Florida property. Disney wanted everyone to experience the rest."
Thank you, you may resume your previous argument. ;)
"You know me. I'm that little voice inside that tells you..."


-
- Practically Lives Here
- Posts: 1143
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 4:55 pm
- Location: CA
Re: Another one bites the dust
That sounds like a case I'd love to see on Judge Judy or The People's Court! :D:hobie16 wrote:And there we have the downside of going public. The visionary vs. The Board.
- hobie16
- Permanent Fixture
- Posts: 10546
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 4:45 pm
- Park: DLR
- Department: Fruity Drink Land
- Position: Mai Tai Face Plant
- Location: 717 Miles NNW Of DLR
Re: Another one bites the dust
It's really more the case of a visionary (Walt) coming up with an idea but not having the capital to make it real. There are two sources, loan(s) or equity (stock). Loans can be paid off but equity seemingly lasts forever.Disneyguy85 wrote:That sounds like a case I'd love to see on Judge Judy or The People's Court! :D:
With equity you also need someone to represent the stockholders. That would be the board. The board will usually do a good job of representing the stockholders because they get paid in stock thus becoming representatives of their own interests.
In the case of building WDW, Walt had a vision (EPCOT) but the board wanted a proven concept (MK). Both eventually got what they wanted. More or less.

Don't be fooled by appearances. In Hawaii, some of the most powerful people look like bums and stuntmen.
--- Matt King
Stay low and run in a zigzag pattern.