I know I will be hated for this but you can thank ADA for that guilt. They have made the rules that are so easy to con with that now everyone in a chair or mobility device is suspect. For some reason, they have determined that being "handicapped" is a shameful situation. They feel that if you had a process that would identify you as a person needing help, you would be embarrassed and appear less than "normal".TechieSidhe wrote:I actually feel kinda guilty when I need a wheelchair. I can make it through 2 days at DW before my lumbar spine gives out. I have 4 herniated disks and some spinal damage. I try to be as independent as I can, but my poor spine can only take so much.
When I do use a wheelchair, I notice the bad looks other patrons give me. I'm a 300 lb girl. I think all they think is that I'm too lazy to use one, and can't see that my legs are Jell-O.
Instead, now anybody, legitimate or not, can be considered "challenged" and no questions can be asked. It is a crappy situation.
Is a person that cannot walk, for example, any more able to walk if they are called challenged instead of handicapped? It isn't the word that is the problem it is the idiots that think that being "handicapped" is a sign of character weakness and must not be mentioned. Quite frankly, they are the ones with the problem not the group they are supposedly serving. It makes me so angry that a bunch of self righteous, narrow minded geeks feel that it is better to be suspect then to be whatever one is. A simple official pass would eliminate the fraud and give people there dignity back.
End of rant!