Disneyland Resort Cast Members post your stupid guest tricks here. This forum is not for general Disneyland discussion. Please use the Break Room, for non stupid guest trick topics.
-
GRUMPY PIRATE
- Permanent Fixture

- Posts: 8780
- Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 11:23 am
- Location: Insane Diego
Post
by GRUMPY PIRATE » Sun Mar 23, 2008 6:50 pm
Princess Susi wrote:Oh please...People will try anything to get money these days. We need a whole threrd devoted to stupid lawsuits. I am sure we all could come up with enough to make the thread the longest in history! LOL!
I get so infuriated when I hear of these ridiculous and frivolous lawsuits. People these days are so sue happy. It started with that idiotic McDonalds coffee one where the woman WON and it paved the way for people to try their own version of win the lottery from a company with deep pockets. Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.....
I am glad Shamu was exonerated.

He shouldn't be dissed like that!
susi
The only good thing that I have seen, is that there are more lawsuits (the Stoopid kind) are being either dismissed by judges, or are being lost in the jury! Plus there has been a backlash, in that some places are enacting "caps" on how much you can be awarded for pain and suffering!
I think Wombat would have some input on this!
:pirateflaARRRRRRR YA DOIN'?
-
Cheshire Figment
- Seasoned Pro

- Posts: 878
- Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 10:16 pm
- Location: Poinciana, FL (20 Miles from WDW)
Post
by Cheshire Figment » Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:28 pm
I guess there are several people here who follow the Stella Awards. The nominations are very interesting, similar in a way to the Darwin Awards, but it has to do with lawsuits.
I think the latest winner was the ALJ from Washington who sued his cleaners for $65,000,000 for a lost or damaged pair of pants. Not only was he a laughingstock, but the agency he worked for fired him for bringing discredit upon them and that he could not function as an ALJ because of the attitude he showed.
-
drcorey
- Should be on Payroll

- Posts: 3230
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 9:39 pm
Post
by drcorey » Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:03 pm
WAH! Disney's food gave me the belching farts and I ruined a 70 dollar pair of farrar slacks, I want a life time pass, NOW! :D:
-
GRUMPY PIRATE
- Permanent Fixture

- Posts: 8780
- Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 11:23 am
- Location: Insane Diego
Post
by GRUMPY PIRATE » Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:12 pm
Cheshire Figment wrote:I guess there are several people here who follow the Stella Awards. The nominations are very interesting, similar in a way to the Darwin Awards, but it has to do with lawsuits.
I think the latest winner was the ALJ from Washington who sued his cleaners for $65,000,000 for a lost or damaged pair of pants. Not only was he a laughingstock, but the agency he worked for fired him for bringing discredit upon them and that he could not function as an ALJ because of the attitude he showed.
I remember reading at great length about that one. It is interesting that he lost his job, but as I understand it, the ALJ's are appointed for only a year or so. The sad part is that the cleaners had to sell the store at that location to pay for the legal fees and such!
:pirateflaARRRRRRR YA DOIN'?
-
BRWombat
- Permanent Fixture

- Posts: 5131
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:00 pm
- Department: Offsite Harmony
- Position: Back Row Baritone
- Location: Dallas area
-
Contact:
Post
by BRWombat » Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:46 pm
GRUMPY PIRATE wrote:The only good thing that I have seen, is that there are more lawsuits (the Stoopid kind) are being either dismissed by judges, or are being lost in the jury! Plus there has been a backlash, in that some places are enacting "caps" on how much you can be awarded for pain and suffering!
I think Wombat would have some input on this!
Me, have an opinion???

:D:
Most higher-ups I've worked with long ago learned not to ask me if taking a particular action with "keep us from getting sued." My stock answer is that there's no such thing. It doesn't take a legitimate reason to file a lawsuit, just a filing fee. There's plenty of idiots out there with warped creativity and a sense of entitlement, and sad to say they'll usually find a lawyer who'll help them. The correct things to ask about any action are, is it legal? is it defensible? and is it a good idea? You do what's right and hope the idiots ignore you.
"This would be a great place if we could only get rid of all these people." - Walt Disney

VocalMajority Twitter
-
hobie16
- Permanent Fixture

- Posts: 10546
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 4:45 pm
- Park: DLR
- Department: Fruity Drink Land
- Position: Mai Tai Face Plant
- Location: 717 Miles NNW Of DLR
Post
by hobie16 » Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:55 pm
BRWombat wrote:There's plenty of idiots out there with warped creativity and a sense of entitlement, and sad to say they'll usually find a lawyer who'll help them.
The only thing worse than that is a whack job who is pro se. We've got one in our neighborhood association that has sued everybody for everything. It's been dragging on for over ten years. He even sued his real estate agent claiming RICO violations.
I went to one hearing to see who he was. He started out sounding like Foghorn Leghorn. That lasted about thirty seconds. He then started screaming at the association lawyer. It was so bad the judge called a bailiff in in case he went nutz.
Don't be fooled by appearances. In Hawaii, some of the most powerful people look like bums and stuntmen.
--- Matt King
Stay low and run in a zigzag pattern.
-
Randy B
- In our Memory

- Posts: 936
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 3:42 am
- Location: Champaign, IL
Post
by Randy B » Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:54 pm
BRWombat wrote:The correct things to ask about any action are, is it legal? is it defensible? and is it a good idea? You do what's right and hope the idiots ignore you.
And document all three in triplicate. Having a hard copy of all the "discussions" detailing all the work to make sure of all three above criteria can go a long way towards showing "all due diligence". I love the court shows on TV and so often a weak arguement wins when they have documentation showing they tried every possible way to solve the problem before resorting to the courts.
Randy
-
jsilvers
- Wide-eyed Newcomer

- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 1:05 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by jsilvers » Mon Mar 24, 2008 3:48 pm
GRUMPY PIRATE wrote:I remember reading at great length about that one. It is interesting that he lost his job, but as I understand it, the ALJ's are appointed for only a year or so. The sad part is that the cleaners had to sell the store at that location to pay for the legal fees and such!
Actually, he had a 10-year appointment that was up for renewal. Usually, if you're going to do something stupid, you would be well-advised not to do do it when you're most vulnerable (but then again, if you're well-advised, you're probably not stupid?...).
-
GRUMPY PIRATE
- Permanent Fixture

- Posts: 8780
- Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 11:23 am
- Location: Insane Diego
Post
by GRUMPY PIRATE » Mon Mar 24, 2008 4:57 pm
jsilvers wrote:Actually, he had a 10-year appointment that was up for renewal. Usually, if you're going to do something stupid, you would be well-advised not to do do it when you're most vulnerable (but then again, if you're well-advised, you're probably not stupid?...).
True..I'm wondering if some of the lawyers that had judgements by him are starting to appeal, based on his faulty logic of the 26 Million dollar cost of his suit pants? Guese he didn't shop at the mens fashion depot!!!
:pirateflaARRRRRRR YA DOIN'?
-
hobie16
- Permanent Fixture

- Posts: 10546
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 4:45 pm
- Park: DLR
- Department: Fruity Drink Land
- Position: Mai Tai Face Plant
- Location: 717 Miles NNW Of DLR
Post
by hobie16 » Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:26 pm
jsilvers wrote:Actually, he had a 10-year appointment that was up for renewal. Usually, if you're going to do something stupid, you would be well-advised not to do do it when you're most vulnerable (but then again, if you're well-advised, you're probably not stupid?...).
GRUMPY PIRATE wrote:True..I'm wondering if some of the lawyers that had judgements by him are starting to appeal, based on his faulty logic of the 26 Million dollar cost of his suit pants? Guese he didn't shop at the mens fashion depot!!!
It was $56 mil. I'd love to see his calculations on how he arrived at that figure.
Don't be fooled by appearances. In Hawaii, some of the most powerful people look like bums and stuntmen.
--- Matt King
Stay low and run in a zigzag pattern.