Page 4 of 6
Re: Infant Stuck in Honey Pots outside of Winnie The Pooh Ride
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 12:00 am
by DisneyMom
Well, you COULD put a little RUM in their Kool-Aid, just to slow 'em down a bit! :p:
Not really, I don't want you all to start in on me, just kidding!

Re: Infant Stuck in Honey Pots outside of Winnie The Pooh Ride
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 3:41 am
by Big Wallaby
Ms. Matterhorn wrote:LOL! Actually, I had a few margaritas when the little darlings went home! I love 'em to pieces, but we grandparents forget how much work the little ones are!
That's why Little Wallaby and I have decided to forgo kids and skip to the grandchildren.
Err, once we figure out the science on that...
Re: Infant Stuck in Honey Pots outside of Winnie The Pooh Ride
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:27 am
by Shorty82
Big Wallaby wrote:That's why Little Wallaby and I have decided to forgo kids and skip to the grandchildren.
Err, once we figure out the science on that...
I've pretty much decided I'll stick to spoiling nephews and nieces from my brother and his wife when they eventually have kids. I have no desire to have children of my own and I know for a fact I wouldn't make a good father right now at this point in my life.
Re: Infant Stuck in Honey Pots outside of Winnie The Pooh Ride
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 10:02 am
by GaTechGal
You'll know when you're ready. I suggest a WIFE first. On the other hand, my DSIL (who has no kids of her own) is the world's best aunt and I think my kids are lucky to have her.
Re: Infant Stuck in Honey Pots outside of Winnie The Pooh Ride
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 1:13 pm
by GRUMPY PIRATE
Big Wallaby wrote:That's why Little Wallaby and I have decided to forgo kids and skip to the grandchildren.
Err, once we figure out the science on that...
Thats easy, adopt a couple of 17 year olds a few months from their birthday and about to graduate high school. In a few years they could be working at WDW, get married, and have some kids!!
Re: Infant Stuck in Honey Pots outside of Winnie The Pooh Ride
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:51 pm
by EeyoresButterfly
The one thing I didn't like about the mentaility is that if it is there it is meant to be climbed on or had pictures taken on. It's one thing if your kid gets away from you, it's quite another if you purposely put them there.
This brings back lots of Ariel's Grotto memories. We have a rock with an Ariel statue on it that serves as a fountain during warmer weather. The top where Ariel is is above my head (so about 5' tall). I can't tell you the number of people that put their kids up on that rock to take pictures when the fountain is not on. There is a hole in the rock for the water to come out, but they don't care about that and get mad at me when I tell them to take their child down. Never mind the hole, what if their kid fell? 5 feet is a long distance for a baby or toddler! It's a shame that we can't have nice decorations that are a part of the theming we are known for out of fear that people will think it is a stinking jungle gym!
Re: Infant Stuck in Honey Pots outside of Winnie The Pooh Ride
Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 10:41 pm
by iframedroger r
Isn't that whole area roped off when entertainment isn't using it?
Re: Infant Stuck in Honey Pots outside of Winnie The Pooh Ride
Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 10:48 pm
by GRUMPY PIRATE
iframedroger r wrote:Isn't that whole area roped off when entertainment isn't using it?
Since when do mere ropes stop an SG??
Re: Infant Stuck in Honey Pots outside of Winnie The Pooh Ride
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 3:56 pm
by Amphigorey
Shorty82 wrote:I've pretty much decided I'll stick to spoiling nephews and nieces from my brother and his wife when they eventually have kids. I have no desire to have children of my own and I know for a fact I wouldn't make a good father right now at this point in my life.
Hey, I just wanted to let you know you aren't the only one. I've been childfree ever since I can remember.
Re: Infant Stuck in Honey Pots outside of Winnie The Pooh Ride
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 7:17 pm
by Tinker Bell
EeyoresButterfly wrote:The one thing I didn't like about the mentaility is that if it is there it is meant to be climbed on or had pictures taken on. It's one thing if your kid gets away from you, it's quite another if you purposely put them there.
This brings back lots of Ariel's Grotto memories. We have a rock with an Ariel statue on it that serves as a fountain during warmer weather. The top where Ariel is is above my head (so about 5' tall). I can't tell you the number of people that put their kids up on that rock to take pictures when the fountain is not on. There is a hole in the rock for the water to come out, but they don't care about that and get mad at me when I tell them to take their child down. Never mind the hole, what if their kid fell? 5 feet is a long distance for a baby or toddler! It's a shame that we can't have nice decorations that are a part of the theming we are known for out of fear that people will think it is a stinking jungle gym!
I went glanced at the thread and then read this... Oh boy! Why do people think that because something is there it is to be climbed, stepped or played with? It is exactly the same thing as the situation you are explaining on Ariel's grotto. So many people sit the kids there. Or they let the kids climbed on the sticks. Just because something is on an area, it doesn't meant it's meant for playing. Does someone has a picture of that place? I'm rather curious.