Re: Please wear an actual shirt
Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 10:31 am
Hey, no offense, but have any of you contemplated that you might just be a bunch of old fuddy-duddies? ;)
Seriously, I'm not interested in seeing products advertised which "aren't for sale" but kids are kids and every generation is a little more liberal than the last. Further, not every country comes from such a puritanical background as ours. Europeans don't freak out if they see a tit. I'm not saying your opinion is invalid, I'm just suggesting that you all might be over thinking the situation a little bit. Sure, parents should be conscious of what their kids are wearing (in the same way they should be conscious if their kid is building bombs in the garage!) but just because your standards are high, doesn't mean everyone's should be. For example, I recall my sister wearing a vintage halter top from the late 60's or early 70's that used to be my mom's (from when my mom had a figure) quite a bit when she was about 17 or so, including on trips to Disneyland. I just don't see a problem. Nothing that shouldn't be showing was, and have any of you noticed that it's pretty hot in California (and florida)? Further, I'm a big guy, but when I'm in shape, I like to wear less too! Right now, I'm keeping my gut tastefully covered, but when it's less round and more flat, I don't mind showing it off a little. (no, I don't borrow the halter top!) :p:
Basically, I'm happy you all are free to laugh about people dressing "inappropriately" here and elsewhere (including to their faces if you so choose)...But I'm sure happy you can't legislate your opinions about that.
(Side note: With the "poo poo on the pee pee" guy, my first thought was lesions as a result of an STD. That would be adequately embarrassing that it would certainly piss off a dad in a public place.... I don't know as I wasn't there, but I might still have watched for other interactions before passing positive or negative judgment on the guy...)
Edited to add: as I recall, my sister was allowed to wear slightly more revealing clothing when she was going to be with the family all day. If she was going to go off on her own, the standards could shift slightly. I'm fairly certain that my parents reasoning was that there's no reason to let her make herself a target when she's going to be alone or without adult supervision...just in case... (And my sister and I both managed to make it through childhood without ever being kidnapped! Go us!)
Seriously, I'm not interested in seeing products advertised which "aren't for sale" but kids are kids and every generation is a little more liberal than the last. Further, not every country comes from such a puritanical background as ours. Europeans don't freak out if they see a tit. I'm not saying your opinion is invalid, I'm just suggesting that you all might be over thinking the situation a little bit. Sure, parents should be conscious of what their kids are wearing (in the same way they should be conscious if their kid is building bombs in the garage!) but just because your standards are high, doesn't mean everyone's should be. For example, I recall my sister wearing a vintage halter top from the late 60's or early 70's that used to be my mom's (from when my mom had a figure) quite a bit when she was about 17 or so, including on trips to Disneyland. I just don't see a problem. Nothing that shouldn't be showing was, and have any of you noticed that it's pretty hot in California (and florida)? Further, I'm a big guy, but when I'm in shape, I like to wear less too! Right now, I'm keeping my gut tastefully covered, but when it's less round and more flat, I don't mind showing it off a little. (no, I don't borrow the halter top!) :p:
Basically, I'm happy you all are free to laugh about people dressing "inappropriately" here and elsewhere (including to their faces if you so choose)...But I'm sure happy you can't legislate your opinions about that.
(Side note: With the "poo poo on the pee pee" guy, my first thought was lesions as a result of an STD. That would be adequately embarrassing that it would certainly piss off a dad in a public place.... I don't know as I wasn't there, but I might still have watched for other interactions before passing positive or negative judgment on the guy...)
Edited to add: as I recall, my sister was allowed to wear slightly more revealing clothing when she was going to be with the family all day. If she was going to go off on her own, the standards could shift slightly. I'm fairly certain that my parents reasoning was that there's no reason to let her make herself a target when she's going to be alone or without adult supervision...just in case... (And my sister and I both managed to make it through childhood without ever being kidnapped! Go us!)