Re: No Leaning on the Rails, For Goodness's Sake
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 9:37 pm
I second "Tammy"!Alyssa3467 wrote:Tammy? :p:
Stupid Guest Tricks
Stories about guest behavior in theme parks.
https://unclewalts.com/forum/
No Leaning on the Rails, For Goodness's Sake
Page 4 of 12
Re: No Leaning on the Rails, For Goodness's Sake
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 9:56 pm
The Timmy and Tammy Show
Coming Soon To An Attraction Near You
Coming Soon To An Attraction Near You
Re: No Leaning on the Rails, For Goodness's Sake
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 10:10 pm
My fellow CM's and I used to love to do this:
Timmy or Tammy is pitching a fit or something, and Mom says, "If you do that again, we're going home", so we'd wait till they passed by us again in the queue and say, "He's doing it again!"
Timmy or Tammy is pitching a fit or something, and Mom says, "If you do that again, we're going home", so we'd wait till they passed by us again in the queue and say, "He's doing it again!"
Re: No Leaning on the Rails, For Goodness's Sake
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 10:53 pm
O.K, I'll third (or fourth?) Tammy, that way its eaiser to remember!!!
Re: No Leaning on the Rails, For Goodness's Sake
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 9:34 am
Another vote for Timmy and Tammy. Tammy isn't such a common name anymore so we're less liable to offend a guest who's not being stupid, as opposed to Debbie which is a more common name.
Re: No Leaning on the Rails, For Goodness's Sake
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:01 am
Who cares if someone with a similiar name is offended, that's their problem.Whazzup wrote:Another vote for Timmy and Tammy. Tammy isn't such a common name anymore so we're less liable to offend a guest who's not being stupid, as opposed to Debbie which is a more common name.
Otherwise, we might as well call them something like tuoafasdfoqw and otadnfoqdfewqior.
Re: No Leaning on the Rails, For Goodness's Sake
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 11:16 am
Okay, I concede that point. I was just trying to avoid offending any Debbies we might have on the SGT board. But you're right, we'd have to come up with something unpronounceable (see quote above) to keep from offending somebody out there. And anyone who comes to this board knows there's a good chance they will be offended at some point or other, and we keep on coming back, don't we, 'cause we love it!ktulu wrote:Who cares if someone with a similiar name is offended, that's their problem.
Otherwise, we might as well call them something like tuoafasdfoqw and otadnfoqdfewqior.
Re: No Leaning on the Rails, For Goodness's Sake
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:13 pm
Those unpronounceable names offend me! I'm also offended by the accusation that there's a good chance I'll be offended coming here! :)Whazzup wrote:Okay, I concede that point. I was just trying to avoid offending any Debbies we might have on the SGT board. But you're right, we'd have to come up with something unpronounceable (see quote above) to keep from offending somebody out there. And anyone who comes to this board knows there's a good chance they will be offended at some point or other, and we keep on coming back, don't we, 'cause we love it!
Re: No Leaning on the Rails, For Goodness's Sake
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 2:43 pm
I just remembered that I used to work with a Lead named Tammy, who as far as I know has an inactive account on this board. 
It was just the first name I thought of that was feminine and similar to Timmy...
It was just the first name I thought of that was feminine and similar to Timmy...
Re: No Leaning on the Rails, For Goodness's Sake
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 5:16 pm
Hmm, you are offended by something you cannot speak....how odd!!Shorty82 wrote:Those unpronounceable names offend me! I'm also offended by the accusation that there's a good chance I'll be offended coming here! :)