Re: This is a new one-Dis Playground police?
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 12:10 pm
And do your best Major Kong impersonation. :D:turkeyham wrote:If you are worried about transportation, just jump onto the monorail. :)
Stories about guest behavior in theme parks.
https://unclewalts.com/forum/
And do your best Major Kong impersonation. :D:turkeyham wrote:If you are worried about transportation, just jump onto the monorail. :)
Resort Guest: applies to one who is staying at a WDW Resort hotel with a current registration and Key to the World card that identifies them as such. This does not apply to those sneaking into the resort to 'visit' their friend/family overnight or to use resort amenities.chartle wrote:I don't want to get all Merriam–Webster here but :) ...
Define "Resort Guest".
And even if it did, if I'm at the GF eating, shopping or just looking around am I not a Guest.
Marked down to 43 sq miles after deannexing Celebration, or so I've been told.mapo wrote:... we are 47 sq miles of an international entertainment resort.
Wikipedia says 47 but I thought it was around 42 now. Wasn't sure about the Sq miles so I averaged.Zazu wrote:Marked down to 43 sq miles after deannexing Celebration, or so I've been told.
Where did you find these definitions? Or are they yours?mapo wrote:Resort Guest: applies to one who is staying at a WDW Resort hotel with a current registration and Key to the World card that identifies them as such. This does not apply to those sneaking into the resort to 'visit' their friend/family overnight or to use resort amenities.
Day Guest: someone who is visting a resort and/or park for the day but will not be residing within a Disney owned and operated Resort hotel for that day/night. [Park Day Guest: one who has presented valid entry media for a specific park on a specific day.]
SG: one who thinks that the sign or policy could not possibly apply to me, cause "I am special".
BTW, we are 47 sq miles of an international entertainment resort.
MAPO
Can't remember where I saw it, but they are deannexing Golden Oaks.chartle wrote:Wikipedia says 47 but I thought it was around 42 now. Wasn't sure about the Sq miles so I averaged.
Also I would think they would have to de annex Golden Oak to keep the way the Reedy Creek Improvement District works.
Each of the Values have a small playground, though they're pretty tucked away out of the high-traffic areas.turkeyham wrote:My dad always has told us to stay on the resort grounds. When we go again, we plan to stay at the Pop Century.
I believe the moderate resorts have the play grounds. I never saw them at the value resorts.
Fine, I'll be the old curmudgeon. I care. I paid for that particular resort. Why should you and your kids get to use its amenities without paying? If I paid to stay there, and you didn't, but my kid can't do X because your kid is doing it? Damn straight I care. A lot.lilogirl wrote:This is a first (for me anyway)! Children not staying at that resort can not use the playgrounds. :( Really? Does anyone care?