Re: Here We Go Again
Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 4:22 pm
You'll get no argument from me... :)Lasolimu wrote:...This case reeks of lawyer...no offense to the member of this profession...who probably agrees. :p:
Stupid Guest Tricks
Stories about guest behavior in theme parks.
https://unclewalts.com/forum/
Here We Go Again
Page 3 of 7
Re: Here We Go Again
Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 4:36 pm
Heck, it usually costs extra to be groped!Lasolimu wrote:If you haven't been accidentally groped at the parks please raise your hand...no one? That's what I thought.
The thing is, you cannot live life without accidentally being touched somewhere you don't like, it's impossible unless you run around in a large hamster ball. Accidents happen, it is best to just accept this fact and move on with your life. It is generally very easy to determine if it was an accident or not and this was clearly an accident(if it even happened at all). If someone accidentally brushing up against you ruins your vacation and causes physical harm, perhaps you have bigger medical needs and probably shouldn't be vacationing at WDW where it is almost guaranteed for this to happen.
This case reeks of lawyer...no offense to the member of this profession...who probably agrees. :p:
Re: Here We Go Again
Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 4:38 pm
(???)BRWombat wrote:You'll get no argument from me... :)
NO argument?
is it snowing in h..e..double toothpicks?
Re: Here We Go Again
Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:08 pm
Why did she wait 2 years to file? Could she not decide if it was a grope or not? Or did a squirrel get in the way?
Re: Here We Go Again
Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:17 pm
Oh man... I wish I could say so much... I'm going for an easy win for Disney. Can I join the beer thing? Lord knows I'm overdo for one too.
Please, please post follow up to this story, I want to know where it ends...
Please, please post follow up to this story, I want to know where it ends...
Re: Here We Go Again
Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:55 pm
After you get the drink, don't forget to open up the emergency exit and slide down!darph nader wrote:I've got $.83 and a cold one,Disney wins.Ok,1/2 a cold one.
Re: Here We Go Again
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 9:50 am
Maybe Disney could countersue for the "extra magic" she received???GRUMPY PIRATE wrote:Heck, it usually costs extra to be groped!
Re: Here We Go Again
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 12:00 pm
Not a bad idea, maybe it would give some of the litigation hungry nutballs a bit of a pause to think about it. (or would that be paws?)BRWombat wrote:Maybe Disney could countersue for the "extra magic" she received???
Re: Here We Go Again
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 1:16 pm
Since I live right near Philly we've been hearing about this case for the last day or two nonstop. I got so pissed when I actually saw the first report (although, Quinn was doing sign language for Donald, so that was kinda cute :) ). There are so many things I want to say, but they're all jumbled up at the moments (blame it on preparing the onth-end financials). It just irks me that this incident (IF there was one) "ruined" this family's whole vacation. Really?!?! I had five of six family members really ill last vacation and it didn't ruin our vacation; we just made the best of the times we went to the parks and took it easy and relaxed back at the room. UGH
And, hey, Freak....Epcot is my absolute favorite park...always has been (thanks for standing up for it, Shorty!).
And, hey, Freak....Epcot is my absolute favorite park...always has been (thanks for standing up for it, Shorty!).
Re: Here We Go Again
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:38 pm
It could really be a fun pleading to draft:GRUMPY PIRATE wrote:Not a bad idea, maybe it would give some of the litigation hungry nutballs a bit of a pause to think about it. (or would that be paws?)BRWombat wrote:Maybe Disney could countersue for the "extra magic" she received???
[INDENT][font="Times New Roman"]1. Defendant The Walt Disney Company (hereinafter "Disney") denies each and every, all and singular, the allegations in Plaintiff's Complaint and demands strict proof thereof.
2. In the alternative, Disney states that the alleged conduct was not actually an assault, but an attraction intended for the enjoyment of Disney guests.
3. By way of affirmative defense, Disney would show that the perpetrator of the alleged conduct was a waterfowl in the Anatidae family of birds, commonly known as a duck, and that Disney cannot be held responsible for the conduct of wild birds.
4. By further way of affirmative defense, Disney alleges that the only boobs present on the date of the alleged incident were the Plaintiff and members of Plaintiff's party (hereinafter "SG's").[/font][/INDENT]