Page 3 of 7

Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2003 11:21 am
by Weeble
I'm curious too.

:pbjtime:

Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2003 7:16 pm
by Old Crow
so i am going to give the benefit of the dought to you and think that you dont know any better but you have really hurt my feelings with your comment
Didn't mean to hurt your feelings but the question was basically aimed at managment, not the CM that the guest sees on the outside. I know you are just doing your job and that you have to put up with how the company runs it's business. Proof of being "handicapted" should be presented in such cases. The idea of being checked is nice too. Obviously you guys have seen what has worked in the past and what should be happening now to prevent such frauds.

I've seen so many kids being "wheeled" around by their friends at the speed of light, taking corners way to fast just becuase it was fun to be in a wheel chair and ride with their friends. Now if you are truely disabled, you should get a SAP and everthing should more comfortable for you to ride certain attractions. I'd gladly give up my space in line or wait 2 or three trains for a disabled person to get the chance to ride. It's just these fraud cases that really piss me off and the lack checking every case to make sure it's valid.

Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2003 7:59 pm
by PoohBunniesHutch
Being disabled is absoultely no fun at all. I have to depend upon others for assistance and its frustrating to be at the whim of others. Achieving mobility for a disabled person is a long term of training and re-learning and being dependent on others for things you all take for granted. It means giving up your wishes in order to not inconveniece anybody. And it really sucks when those teens play as if it is fun to be in a wheelchair and laugh and be giddy. If they really knew what it was like, maybe they wouldn't find it so amusing!

Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2003 4:46 pm
by BirdMom
disneydyke wrote:I hate it when I get this way, but... did it work?
Nope.

She ended up having a quickie wedding to another CM, then they got divorced after the kid was born...

Personally, I think the kid was conceived somewhere in the bowels of the big house...

Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2003 12:47 pm
by Weeble
Hmmm, if they had stuck to the bowels, they wouldn't be in that situation....


:pbjtime:

God I love having no class.

Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2003 3:49 pm
by BirdMom
Weeble wrote:Hmmm, if they had stuck to the bowels, they wouldn't be in that situation....

True, but the Supreme Court hadn't given sodomy the o.k. back then...

Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2003 11:10 am
by Weeble
Either way it would be criminal, criminal if they went to the bad place and criminal if she had that kid.

Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2003 4:31 pm
by BirdMom
Weeble wrote:Either way it would be criminal, criminal if they went to the bad place and criminal if she had that kid.
Well, whattaya gonna do? One of the mysteries in this world is the fact that you need to get a license to do everything from fishing and owning a bicycle or pet to driving and of course, getting married, but you don't need to pass a test, let alone get a license to contribute to the gene pool...and anyone who worked at Disneyland at a certain period in the early 90's knows of more than one set of scary couples there who ended up having children together...eeeeeeeekkkkkkkkkkk!!!!!!!!! I can think of one kid in particular who ended up being a carbon copy of his daddy, a former r.o. who wasn't the brightest bulb in the pack...

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2003 12:52 am
by Freak
BirdMom wrote: .....you need to get a license to do everything......owning a bicycle
What the hell? I need a license for my bike?

Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2003 1:07 am
by Dante101
Don't admit online to not having a bike licence! You'll have every cop in the county swarming all over your place!! :P