Re: Marsupials, and Rodents, and Tall Guys, Oh, My!
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 3:39 pm
What are you testing? Are you testing whether or not people will follow your instruction?BRWombat wrote:Just testing something here, ignore this post...
Stories about guest behavior in theme parks.
https://unclewalts.com/forum/
What are you testing? Are you testing whether or not people will follow your instruction?BRWombat wrote:Just testing something here, ignore this post...
Maybe. (0-1) :D:Lasolimu wrote:What are you testing? Are you testing whether or not people will follow your instruction?
To late. :(BRWombat wrote:Just testing something here, ignore this post...
Is there any specific part of this post that should be ignored?BRWombat wrote:Just testing something here, ignore this post...
But how are you determining who is ignoring it? I mean, we've got well over 2000 registered people on this site (I'm sure Cujo or Polar can get an exact number) that may have read the post and ignored. So, shouldn't the count be like 2000+-3? And are you counting just the post that you said to ignore or anyone else who responds to this thread? Cause with the way we go off-topic, pretty much every active member will have responded to this thread at some point in the future.BRWombat wrote:0-3. Wow, y'all really aren't good at ignoring things. :D:
Kinda tough there big guy,it's like an old episode of Candid Camera, "Do Not read this sign under Penalty of Law".BRWombat wrote:0-3. Wow, y'all really aren't good at ignoring things. :D:
LOL! too funny Figment. :D:Cheshire Figment wrote:Is there any specific part of this post that should be ignored?
Ve have vays of knowink these thinks.lady ulrike wrote:But how are you determining who is ignoring it? I mean, we've got well over 2000 registered people on this site (I'm sure Cujo or Polar can get an exact number) that may have read the post and ignored. So, shouldn't the count be like 2000+-3? And are you counting just the post that you said to ignore or anyone else who responds to this thread? Cause with the way we go off-topic, pretty much every active member will have responded to this thread at some point in the future.
That was a joke? I was once arrested for that.darph nader wrote:Kinda tough there big guy,it's like an old episode of Candid Camera, "Do Not read this sign under Penalty of Law".