DLR employee sent home for wearing muslim head covering

News about Theme Parks and their parent companies.
Disneyguy85
Practically Lives Here
Practically Lives Here
Posts: 1143
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 4:55 pm
Location: CA

Re: DLR employee sent home for wearing muslim head covering

Post by Disneyguy85 » Thu Sep 09, 2010 2:14 am

DisneyMom wrote:Just for the record, I wouldn't care about the hijab if she was wearing it at the Storyteller's Cafe. Employers are always going to try to control things,it's their turf.
I agree.



User avatar
ktulu
Permanent Fixture
Permanent Fixture
Posts: 4150
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 1:01 pm
Park: ktululand
Department: Custodial
Position: Janitor
Location: Texas
Contact:

Re: DLR employee sent home for wearing muslim head covering

Post by ktulu » Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:14 am

DisneyMom wrote: Just for the record, I wouldn't care about the hijab if she was wearing it at the Storyteller's Cafe. Employers are always going to try to control things,it's their turf.Will need a court to decide if she has that particular Freedom at DLR. :cool:
And the court should side with Disney. They are not denying her employment, so it should not be an issue.


"People can drink coke and pepsi, but they can't pee in the street."

812114

svickersart
Regular Guest
Regular Guest
Posts: 380
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:57 pm
Location: Sacramento Ca
Contact:

Re: DLR employee sent home for wearing muslim head covering

Post by svickersart » Thu Sep 09, 2010 6:17 pm

I read an artical on yahoo this morning about questions your employer could not ask. In the religion segment there was this statement

"Employers are required to accommodate an employee's religious beliefs or practices in regards to things such as dress and grooming policy and flexible scheduling."

heres a link to the artical

http://finance.yahoo.com/career-work/ar ... to-ask-you

I think Disney has made a great effort to do this, she has declined thier offers and chose to go home and create what she thought was going to be negative publicity.

Steve



CujoSR
Practically Lives Here
Practically Lives Here
Posts: 1423
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 2:00 pm
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Contact:

Re: DLR employee sent home for wearing muslim head covering

Post by CujoSR » Thu Sep 09, 2010 11:36 pm

That may be true but there are no references in the article siting the actual law pertaining to it.


"A little swordplay, now and then, keeps my mind off sheep!"

"You're messing with my Zen thing, man."

"Dreams are as portals,
flat visions of misty places,
fragments bound below my surface,
but I can write dreams,
they flow from me,
inscribed but now unbound,
I touch them,
and they are real,
and they are real."
Image

User avatar
Main Streeter
Permanent Fixture
Permanent Fixture
Posts: 4608
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 6:10 am
Location: D L
Contact:

Re: DLR employee sent home for wearing muslim head covering

Post by Main Streeter » Fri Sep 10, 2010 2:58 am

Leads & I were talking abt this last night. We can't wear a cross on stage. We can't wear a cross on our ONE ring per hand CMs are allowed. I'm Catholic & must cover my necklace. Did I know before I signed with DLR? Probably. Does this bother me? Not at all.



"You work here? You must be SO rich!"


RESCUE A PET! [font="Arial Black"]Within the heart of every stray Lies the singular desire to be loved.[/font]

User avatar
Mayonnaise
Practically Lives Here
Practically Lives Here
Posts: 1011
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:15 am
Location: The REAL Saratoga Springs
Contact:

Re: DLR employee sent home for wearing muslim head covering

Post by Mayonnaise » Fri Sep 10, 2010 8:16 am

One ring per hand?

Does that mean a woman can't wear her engagement ring and wedding band together on the left ring finger as is commonly done?

8^/



DisneyMom
Permanent Fixture
Permanent Fixture
Posts: 5002
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 7:14 pm
Park: DLR Guest
Department: Churro Inspection
Position: In Line for POTC

Re: DLR employee sent home for wearing muslim head covering

Post by DisneyMom » Fri Sep 10, 2010 11:45 am

Mayonnaise wrote:One ring per hand?

Does that mean a woman can't wear her engagement ring and wedding band together on the left ring finger as is commonly done?

8^/
I had my Wedding and engagement ring fused together,but I can't imagine that even Disney would be checking on such a thing..... :confused:

CMs should encourage their beloveds to get them a very large and expensive ring just in case I am wrong ;)


:flybongo: NO BULL!!!!!:D:

CBeilby
Practically Lives Here
Practically Lives Here
Posts: 1082
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:55 am

Re: DLR employee sent home for wearing muslim head covering

Post by CBeilby » Fri Sep 10, 2010 1:39 pm

Mayonnaise wrote:One ring per hand?

Does that mean a woman can't wear her engagement ring and wedding band together on the left ring finger as is commonly done?

8^/
That's the one exception to the rule - a wedding and engagement ring are considered a set and allowed.


For Randy, For Bonny, For Chris...
Image

felinefan
Should be on Payroll
Should be on Payroll
Posts: 3174
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 1:23 am
Location: SoCal

Re: DLR employee sent home for wearing muslim head covering

Post by felinefan » Sat Sep 11, 2010 3:01 pm

Amphigorey wrote:Seriously, don't trust things you read in email forwards. They're meant to scare you, not inform you. Do your own research, know your sources, check your data.
I must respectfully disagree. The person I get them from is someone I've been communicating with for quite some time, and the forward was a direct quote from knowledgable sources.

This is the last time I'll make a statement on this issue. Many times in history, htere were people who sounded the alarm that such-andsuch country or group of people were ready to attack the U.S., and their warnings were disregarded. Right before the attack on Pearl Harbor, there were warnings that Japan was going to attack Pearl Harbor where the U.S. Navy had their fleet. Even as the Zero fighters were approaching and starting to bomb the harbor, frantic phone calls to the brass were rebuffed with warnings against making false reports. It wasn't until the middle of the attack that the brass found out it wasn't a prank. Same thing with 9/11; nobody listened until too late.

I once read soewhere that a historian researched why the great civilizations of the world rose and fell. When I find that article, I will supply it. I can even supply the email forwards upon request. I saved them.

Just remember this when Muslims take over the U.S., and I'll be saying I told you so.


Image

Goofyernmost
Practically Lives Here
Practically Lives Here
Posts: 1126
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 6:31 pm
Location: North Carolina

Re: DLR employee sent home for wearing muslim head covering

Post by Goofyernmost » Sat Sep 11, 2010 3:40 pm

felinefan wrote:I must respectfully disagree. The person I get them from is someone I've been communicating with for quite some time, and the forward was a direct quote from knowledgable sources.

This is the last time I'll make a statement on this issue. Many times in history, htere were people who sounded the alarm that such-andsuch country or group of people were ready to attack the U.S., and their warnings were disregarded. Right before the attack on Pearl Harbor, there were warnings that Japan was going to attack Pearl Harbor where the U.S. Navy had their fleet. Even as the Zero fighters were approaching and starting to bomb the harbor, frantic phone calls to the brass were rebuffed with warnings against making false reports. It wasn't until the middle of the attack that the brass found out it wasn't a prank. Same thing with 9/11; nobody listened until too late.

I once read soewhere that a historian researched why the great civilizations of the world rose and fell. When I find that article, I will supply it. I can even supply the email forwards upon request. I saved them.

Just remember this when Muslims take over the U.S., and I'll be saying I told you so.
If I were to believe forwarded e-mails I would have to argue that they already have through Obama. :twisted: To my credit, I don't believe anything I read and only half of what I see.


:goofy: :goofy:

Post Reply