Re: DLR employee sent home for wearing muslim head covering
Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 2:51 pm
Mayo, LOVE your phrasing!Mayonnaise wrote:the bizarre slippery slope argument you posited doesn't carry.
8^S

Stories about guest behavior in theme parks.
https://unclewalts.com/forum/
Mayo, LOVE your phrasing!Mayonnaise wrote:the bizarre slippery slope argument you posited doesn't carry.
8^S
She doesn't have a leg to stand on then, so she should quit with the whining.Disneyguy85 wrote:Yes, and they did.
Most recently, they offered this costume, and she refused it;
http://ocresort.ocregister.com/files/20 ... stume2.jpg
(This photo link is from the OC Register "Around Disney" blog)
That actually looks pretty reasonable to me. Thank you for the link!Disneyguy85 wrote:Yes, and they did.
Most recently, they offered this costume, and she refused it;
http://ocresort.ocregister.com/files/20 ... stume2.jpg
(This photo link is from the OC Register "Around Disney" blog)
sorry, but your evaluation is incorect and not germaine.Amphigorey wrote:Dude, your burqa argument is disingenuous and makes no sense. The logic, it is not there in your statement.
I'm making no comment on her behavior; I'm just saying that Disney is perfectly able to incorporate hijabs into the Disney Look. The Look is fungible, not set in stone; we have seen it change in recent years.
A hijab is not a big deal. It's just a scarf. It's meaningful to the person who wears it, not anyone else. It's not distracting or loud or offensive; it would blend in perfectly well with pretty much every onstage costumed role.
Oh really. In what way is her statement not germane to the conversation?GRUMPY PIRATE wrote:sorry, but your evaluation is incorect and not germaine.
OMG, I had no idea my Sikh patients are carrying a bladeGRUMPY PIRATE wrote:sorry, but your evaluation is incorect and not germaine.
if she was allowed full choice over her costume, then what.
next up, people of the sikh faith.
I have some eperience with this.
many many years ago, when I was in the navy, an enlisted sailor had converted to this religion. the particular sect required that he wear a turban, grow a beard, and carry a scimitar.
he got a special permission to wear a white turban with his dress uniform, and at the time, the grooming standards allowed a beard (as long as a air tight seal could be made when wearing air breathing devices, such as firefight OBA's etc) as to the sword, he got a nope, not gonna happen. (strangely enough, if he had been an officer, he could have worn it in place of the navy sword)
now lets take the devote lady that demands that disney bend over backwards for her and rejects anything they offered. So if she wins, then a precedent has been established in the courts and disney lost.
what then has been established is that an employer has no right to establish a costume, because anyone has the right to wear when they deem appropriate for their religion.
suddenly you have some sikh's wearing their turbans and (for men) beards in costume working at any of the venues. then you have another portion of women from the muslim faith wanting to wear full coverning burkas.
Just Joking, I hope you all know,wouldn't want to anger anyone of any culture.DisneyMom wrote:OMG, I had no idea my Sikh patients are carrying a bladeBetter not anger them......
I like the Burqa for cold and flu season,hate all the microbes blasted at me![]()