Re: Planes
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 9:35 pm
I'm not sure I did this right. If I did, here are a couple of pics of the most recent car.
Stories about guest behavior in theme parks.
https://unclewalts.com/forum/
Nice lookin' 'stang. 302?YANXWIN wrote:[ATTACH=CONFIG]418[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]419[/ATTACH]
I'm not sure I did this right. If I did, here are a couple of pics of the most recent car.
Ford and the after market guys have done some nice things with the 351. If you're more of a cruiser you need a hot cam that gives the engine a nice lope at idle.YANXWIN wrote:Original 289 removed to add a little juice. 351 now. It moves ok. I'm more the idle around and sound good guy. It has to look good though.
SAWEEEET. Would give my ex-wife for that car.hobie16 wrote:Ford and the after market guys have done some nice things with the 351. If you're more of a cruiser you need a hot cam that gives the engine a nice lope at idle.
My first real car was a '62 500XL. It had a 406 with 3x2s and 11.4:1 compression. I had to run 120 octane Chevron Custom Supreme so it wouldn't knock. It had such a pronounced lope at idle that it would scare off potential red light racers. Fun car.
The '63 Merc probably had a 427. They were rated at 425 hp but actually put out around 600. The Mercs did better in NASCAR racing because of their aerodynamics.darph nader wrote:SAWEEEET. Would give my ex-wife for that car.
A friend of mines dad had a 63 Merc with the same set-up. He claims it would do 130 in third gear and local LEOS would come lookin for him to race against their cruisers.