Re: Ever been hypnotized by a marsupial?
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 7:13 pm
Yes, off property. NOT WDW related. Look for p m Dels :)delsdad wrote:I will try to attend ! Is there a show Aug 20? Is it on or off property?
Stories about guest behavior in theme parks.
https://unclewalts.com/forum/
Yes, off property. NOT WDW related. Look for p m Dels :)delsdad wrote:I will try to attend ! Is there a show Aug 20? Is it on or off property?
That's not too difficult.PatchOBlack wrote:It was much better than Cats"
glendalais wrote: All hail Wallaby.
:D: :D: :D: :D: :D: All hail the Hypnotoad!LadySiren wrote:WTF, I spent like 15 minutes staring at that thing.
PatchOBlack wrote:It was much better than Cats.
Going to have to disagree with you there, Lasolimu. Cats happens to be a favorite of mine. Given that it was the 2nd longest running Broadway show, and the 4th longest running in the history of musical theater, I would say that I'm not alone.Lasolimu wrote:That's not too difficult.![]()
I don't know what it is about Andrew Lloyd-Webber musicals. I rarely get to first-run shows, but I'll usually hear the soundtrack at some point and my reaction always seems to be the same -- I'll like one or two songs but dismiss the rest as not very good. But then I'll listen to it all again. And again and again. And at some point my opinion will change and I'll decide I really enjoy it all. (Question for Big Wallaby: Can you work hypnotic suggestions into a musical score???)PatchOBlack wrote:Going to have to disagree with you there, Lasolimu. Cats happens to be a favorite of mine. Given that it was the 2nd longest running Broadway show, and the 4th longest running in the history of musical theater, I would say that I'm not alone.
I have only seen it once, very recently, and have absolutely no desire to ever see it again. Most of the characters were completely forgettable and I only found one song very memorable. I was even told by someone who has seen several different versions(including Broadway as I recall) and was told that this was one of the best performances of it they had ever seen, in other words, if I didn't like this one, chances are I wouldn't like any version. I think it's popular simply because it's Andrew Lloyd Webber and not actually a good show.PatchOBlack wrote:Going to have to disagree with you there, Lasolimu. Cats happens to be a favorite of mine. Given that it was the 2nd longest running Broadway show, and the 4th longest running in the history of musical theater, I would say that I'm not alone.