Stupid Guest Tricks

Disneyguy85 wrote:I NEVER thought that a parent would resort to stuffing their child in a duffel bag!

Which brings up the questions, why did she have a duffel bag with her and had she done this before?

I'm stealing that story and putting it on my blog. With attribution to "an excellent online forum."

That lady should be tared and feathered for her stupidity. Child services and the police need to be called on that one.

SkipperGordon wrote: and all I got to do for the Dry was wave a stuffed cow at Twister.

what, like a feather on a stick that you wave at a cat? Did Twister need some exercise and stimulation? Trying to get Twister to smile for the camera?


Kid-in-a-bag is eyeroll inducing but as I'm becoming inured to the plague of dogs in bags and strollers, I'm not nearly as shocked as I probably ought to be.

kurtisnelson wrote:I'm stealing that story and putting it on my blog. With attribution to "an excellent online forum."

figured this was where it originated...

that was a horrifying story. I wonder did she just leave or did she get a talking to by security when she left the building. it's a good thing bags are kept to the sides of the room. (child swap would have been easier)

hobie16 wrote:Which brings up the questions, why did she have a duffel bag with her and had she done this before?

Those are excellent questions. And I seriously hope not for the second one.

I agree. That story wins.

I can only say....OH...MY...GOD!!! I'm a mom; I've done the child swap because he's too short (on both boys)....you just deal with it. I cannot believe this woman would stick her child in a duffle bag.

hobie16 wrote:Which brings up the questions, why did she have a duffel bag with her and had she done this before?

I tend to think that she had done it before or at least they practiced otherwise how did they know the kid fit in the bad and that she would be able to haul him around in it!

CptnSkippy wrote:Wonder if they flew in to Orlando? Why buy a ticket when you can take a carry-on. Imagine the looks on TSA's face when that went through the scanners.

It would not be the first time. It happened in 1987 in Winnipeg http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1 ... 49,2330000
and twice since then at LAX. The Winnipeg incedent was idiot screeners not letting the woman remove the baby before they sent the papoose through the scanner. The LAX incedents may have been due to language barriers and inexperianced travellers. But in all cases it appears that the person watching the screen immediatly realized there was a baby in the machine.