Remember, this is the same company that disbanded (no pun intended) the Main Street Marching Band and dismissed all of it's long-term (and thus older) members, only to create a new band a year later composed entirely of younger performers.GaTechGal wrote:Personally, I can't remember ever seeing a Dapper Dan that I thought was under 40. The age requirement seems out of wack.
Wanna be a Dapper Dan?
- Zazu
- Permanent Fixture
- Posts: 4133
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 3:00 pm
- Park: WDW
- Position: retired
- Location: 8 miles east of Spaceship Earth
- Contact:
Re: Wanna be a Dapper Dan?
Zazu
-
- Practically Lives Here
- Posts: 1170
- Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 1:30 pm
- Park: Canadas Top
- Department: Concert Hall!
- Position: Making Lights Move!
- Location: The Great White North eh!
Re: Wanna be a Dapper Dan?
And less expensive, no doubt, due to their lack of seniority! Companies all over pull that same stunt.Zazu wrote:Remember, this is the same company that disbanded (no pun intended) the Main Street Marching Band and dismissed all of it's long-term (and thus older) members, only to create a new band a year later composed entirely of younger performers.
Re: Wanna be a Dapper Dan?
delsdad wrote:And less expensive, no doubt, due to their lack of seniority! Companies all over pull that same stunt.
The usual scenario is the make sure to "downsize" one or two low seniority employees for every 50 or so high seniority employees. That way there aren't any EEOC complaints.